top of page
Facebook Page Cover copy 50 (1).png
Post: Blog2_Post
C-6 Senators

CA Dad SCREAMING & TReVoices Is Bringing An Army To Stand Behind Him! GROOMING Kids! Not Here!

I have repeatedly said that parents need to SCREAM Louder, fight harder and start to flip over some desks. A California Dad has accepted my challenge. This Dad has already walked into the hornets' nest, undeterred at the shouts of hate. He is walking back again on August 16th. I'll be damned if I don't find an army to walk behind him this time!


I have offered to come, stand behind Steve, and speak if needed and I will keep my word. If a donor wants to pay for this, I will be there SCREAMING Louder with this Dad. But, we have already started supporting Steve. TReVoices has sent $300 worth of TReVoices Shirts to unify the people who will be attending to help Steve. The goal is 1500 people and 1500 shirts!


We have created a link for other parents attending to purchase T-Shirts at cost. Link




We are also asking for donations to cover others who will be attending, uniting all to assemble, hand in hand with Steve in support of Steve and in support of parents worldwide to STOP grooming kids into believing they are trans; handing them all T-Shirts! Trust me! This will get us exposure in mainstream media. For those who have followed me since the beginning? You have seen this whole thing grow, trust me here, trust me now; this could be huge; trust my gut on this!


-Scott Newgent


See Steve's Story below!

 









Order Shirts At Cost Here


Grooming, and we all know California is not only doing this, but they are also promoting themselves as a haven for all parents who receive any guff from their state about the medical process regarding children.


Below is a timeline of a fight Steve Schneider has accepted with a California school board.


In January of 2022, my youngest daughter Jamie returned to her third-grade classroom at Maple Elementary School. Over winter break, two children transitioned from a girl to a boy. [or: two girls “transitioned” to boys. The teacher wanted to promote “inclusion” in the school and sought permission from the principal to play a video. . The teacher asked if parental consent was needed to show the video, and she was told not to include the parents or inform them about the video showing.

A few days after the video was shown, my daughter's friends said they wanted to be boys. They pressured my daughter to shave her head and dress like a boy. They were introduced with an idea and thought of it as play. My daughter did not give in to the pressure, but we had to pull her away from her friends. She was 8yearsold at the time, and to this day, she still believes in Santa Claus. To introduce something like this is unconscionable, especially without notifying parents.




In a video shown to the class, a woman reads the book Call Me Max. It's a story about a six-year-old transgender child, another cross-dressing child and his very misinformed parents. Here's a quote: "When a baby grows up to be transgender, it means that the grown-up who said they were a boy or a girl made a mistake." The illustration shows a baby shouting and pointing angrily at his parents. It teaches transgenderism to children in a way that flippantly encourages changing genders, and cross-dressing and gives the reader the impression that if you like climbing trees and bugs you might be trapped trans.

The school did not attempt to inform us about what was happening with my daughter's classmate; we learned about this from our child. The following day my wife met with the teacher and asked her to send us a video copy, which she did. We asked the school to contact us, and they never did. I then walked my daughter to school and confronted the principal. She denied everything and ran away into her office, refusing to speak with me.



My frustration with the lack of communication led me to attend my first school board meeting, where I shared what had happened to my child. There was no follow-up and the matter was brushed away like they didn't care. I then reached out to a local paper. The Conejo Guardian reported on what had happened to our family.


A few days after the article was published , the school was vandalized. Someone wrote "Pervs Wk Here" in big letters on the exterior of the building. I was then contacted by the Ventura County Sheriffs and told that I was a suspect, as they received a "substantial" amount of calls identifying me as the suspect. My home was searched, and some community members came out against me. It was challenging, but I was cleared of all charges.

The Superintendent wrote a scathing, shaming response to every parent in the district criticizing me and the newspaper for not being inclusive and stating that if you don't agree with any LGBTQ books being read to your child, you are anti-LGBTQ. He also inferred that we were the vandals. The Conejo Guardian responded to the Superintendent by reminding him that nothing in his statement challenged the facts of what happened in the classroom. The community is divided and confused about this issue.




Since then, we have attended many school board meetings, but starting on June 14th of this year, the crowd of upset parents who supported me started growing. At the last meeting, we had approximately 450 people with us and 150 against us. We are ramping up for the election to replace three of the five school board members with community members who will honour parents' concerns regarding what sensitive sexual topics their kids are allowed to see at school.

This board has not backed off one bit. The Superintendent even went so far as to call everyone who respectfully disagrees with these radical lessons in primary school “kids haters”. He said the classes would continue however he and the teachers wanted to, and they will not be informing the parents when these controversial “lessons” take place.

I chose to stand for my kids and all the kids in this district. At the school board meeting, I've been called a Nazi, which is twisted as my father is from Israel and I'm Jewish. Antifa is a constant problem, and plenty of operatives go after us. The beauty in this is that I’ve gotten to know fantastic people willing to join in the fight to protect our kids. The people who support me mean the world to me. There's plenty more going on, and I'd be happy to speak with you further.


- Steve Schneider


Added Info On The California Legislator - August 3rd!


California’s Democratic legislators – the same group that has been consistently incapable of voting to approve single payer universal healthcare for all its residents – are poised to approve an Orwellian piece of legislation, that requires, on the taxpayers’ dime, the repeated indoctrination of everyone in the medical or mental health profession through “cultural competency training” for the stated purpose of providing “trans-inclusive healthcare.” This bill, California Senate Bill 923, introduced by Senator Scott Wiener, SD 11, must be defeated.


While “trans-inclusive healthcare” sounds benign, what it means is indoctrination in sex denialism – the conflation of sex and gender, and the idea that sex doesn’t exist or has no significance and must be overridden by subjective “gender identity.” It also means promoting “gender affirming services” -the medicalization of gender non-conformity or the idea that the body is “wrong” and must be modified through the ingestion of hormones and multiple surgeries if the personality fails to “match” sex stereotypes of how men and women, boys and girls, are supposed to act and behave, and who they are supposed to love.

The new acronym of groups for whose benefit this training is supposed to be conducted is “TGI” – “individuals who identify as transgender, gender non-conforming, or intersex.” The “LGB” is gone from this acronym, subsumed no doubt in “transgender” and “gender non-conforming”, as indeed, medicalization often means “transing away the gay.” The promoted “gender affirming services” include “feminizing mammoplasty, male chest reconstruction, mastectomy, facial feminization surgery, hysterectomy, oophorectomy, penectomy, orchiectomy, feminizing genitoplasty, metoidioplasty, phalloplasty, scrotoplasty, voice masculinization or feminization” as well as hormone therapy.

Somehow, stopping children’s puberty, giving “wrong sex” hormones, removing healthy body parts of minors and adults alike, and rendering sterile those who do not conform to sex stereotypes is promoted as “progressive” rather than recognized as the 1950’s style sexism and homophobia that it truly is. And the medical and mental health profession is to be indoctrinated into this “treatment” with no dissenters or alternative non-invasive approaches to gender-role non-compliance and bodily unhappiness allowed.


The curriculum for this training is not being established by a representative group of gender non-conforming people, as many lesbians and feminists are gender non-conforming without denying their sex, but their perspective is uniformly disregarded. Rather, it is a state recognized group of gender identity ideologues called the California Transgender Advisory Council made up of such organizations as Transgender Law Center, California TRANScends, and Equality California, the last the result of the forced marriage between the “LGB” and the “TQ”, in which gender identity ideology overrides everything else.


Also unheard are the growing ranks of de-transitioners, mostly females and mostly lesbians, who are rejecting their “transition” and the medicalization of their non-compliance with sex stereotypes and have come to accept their bodies, their gender non-conformity, and/or their homosexuality.


Health practitioners in California will instead be “trained” in using “TGI-inclusive” terminology including “correct names and pronouns,” and instructed to avoid “making assumptions about gender identity by using gender neutral language.” And the consequences for not complying can be dire. If a complaint or grievance is filed and a decision made in favor of the complainant, the practitioner may not only be subjected to submitting to another “training” but may have her or his name publicly posted by regulatory boards. The bill provides that a willful violation of these requirements by a health care plan would be a crime. We can just imagine how long health practitioners would be able to remain in business and on referral lists for non-compliance.


Biological sex is highly relevant to health care. Our patriarchal medical system has long ignored the specific bodily needs of women and the important physical differences between the sexes beyond obvious differences in reproductive organs. According to Sarah L. Berga, MD, Wake Forest Baptist Health’s chair of obstetrics and gynecology and Vice President for Women’s Health Service, in an article entitled, Medicine Looking Deeper into Vital Differences Between Women and Men, “We’re beginning to truly understand how men and women differ in very fundamental ways and how these differences affect disease risk, symptoms, diagnostic sensitivity and specificity, and responses to therapy.” Women have traditionally been excluded from clinical trials and treated as merely smaller men, to our detriment. Should SB 923 become law, will medical practitioners be penalized for recognizing the sex of their patients?


It is ironic that when other countries such as liberal Sweden and the UK are beginning to question and limit the “affirmative care” medical model for addressing gender non-conformity and especially questioning and restricting the gender transitioning of children as in “Swedish U-Turn on Gender Transitioning for Children”, that California is trying to silence all dissenters.


The solution to gender unhappiness is not engaging in extreme body modification, that only profits the pharmaceutical industry and cosmetic surgeons. There is nothing wrong with being female or being gender non-conforming or lesbian or gay that requires “fixing the body.” Rather it is our society, not our bodies, that is in need of repair. As one female detransitioner put it:


“For eight years I thought I was transgender…the only way I had known to process the frightening, uncomfortable or disempowering aspects of being a woman had been to escape womanhood and see myself as something else…It’s been four years since I re-identified as a woman. My gender dysphoria was real and often painful, but the way for me to resolve it wasn’t by becoming a man. It was by questioning and rejecting the stories society had told me about what it means to be a woman.”


A number of professional organizations oppose this bill, among them the American College of Pediatricians, the California Chapter American College of Cardiology, the California Rheumatology Alliance, and the International Federation for Therapeutic and Counseling Choice. Please help defeat SB 923 and join FIST in the struggle for women’s liberation from the tyranny of gender ideology and medical malpractice masquerading as “affirmative care” by contacting the members of the Appropriations Committee and demanding they vote NO.


Transman
Scott Newgent

Follow Scott @NotScottNewgent

bottom of page