Martin Luther King stated, "judge by the content of character," and not the societal subgroup to which you are locked into!

Offend EVERYONE with TRUTH!

Written by Scott Newgent, a transgender person.

Where we do not agree is in one particular area, but it is probably not as much as you may expect.

There was no malicious intent behind this message, and I believe that it is deserving of a genuine answer. When I think of the Martin Luther King Jr. Speech, in especially the,

"I have a dream that one day my four young children will live in a country where they will not be judged by the color of their skin but rather by the content of their character."

By Martin Luther King, Jr.

The same dream continues to elude us to this day!

The movement to legalize romantic long-term unions in order to safeguard same-sex couples and provide them with legal and financial protection is a right that ought to be extended to everyone. In no way do these legal rights infringe upon the rights of other people.

Where we crossed the line was gays/lesbians demanding marriage as seen by religion. Each religion should have the ability to decide what they believe and deny what they do not BELEIVE.

However, if you take a step back, you will notice that the trans ideology is quite comparable to the demand for "marriage" privileges and the imposition of religion, which is an ideology that is founded on personal perceptions or faith. The distinction lies in the fact that religion, as opposed to gender ideology, strives to operate in accordance with ethical principles and to assist others via faith. The ideology of transgender people does not accept "no" as an answer and instead screams intolerance, hatred, and mayhem if other people do not believe the same thing.

Both ideologies ought to be permitted within a society, but they ought to be monitored to make certain that they do not deviate from the norm, as trans ideology has done.

Even if you believe that Christianity is a morally superior religion, the same may be said about the transgender community. Which one is correct? How come your viewpoint should be given a higher priority? When all is said and done, it is also an ideology.

In light of this, I believe that the practice of coercing society to accept gay couples to enter into 'religious' marriages is not only unethical but also against human rights, the right to freedom of religion. These rights should be protected by the law. If a religion opposed homosexuality they are free to do so and deny performing marriage ceremonies with same sex partners.

Human Rights go both ways or at least it should.

The right to live where we want, the right to work where we want, and the right to be free from the fear of being imprisoned for who we love are all rights that are necessary yet to be granted.

It is imperative that we STOP being quiet because we do not wish to cause any offense. Infuriate everyone, since it will generate debate, which is exactly what is required.

A significant number of us homosexuals chose to remain silent in order to avoid being shunned by our community because the agenda around gay marriage was taken to an extreme. This procedure is the very essence of the reason why we are in this position.

The missing piece of necessary discourse, which is muted for fear on both sides, causes a social civil war, and the only people who benefit from it are the so-called "influencers" within social media. The most significant issue that arises from this disarray is the fact that the individuals whom Christians idolize today are the dds. All of these new models of celebrity are promoting what is taking place.

You see, in order to become a current influencer and acquire large quantities of money and renown, all that is required is a little bit of charisma, money, tenacity, targeting a subtribe, and scaring the heck out of people to the point where they become immobile and chant that you have to heal and to differentiate yourself from all others. Not only is a cult developing inside the transgender community, but it is also developing everywhere and in every subtribe.

The question "Why do you still like Matt Walsh, he's such a religious jerk?" is one that I get asked very frequently. It took a lot of bravery for Matt to be the first influential person to engage in argument between society subtribes that went against each other. Thank you for that. Matt is not a jerk, and although we have different points of view, in the end, Matt has always done what is right when it comes to helping and protecting children. If Matt is able to irritate you on occasion, then so be it; he does the same to me. However, you should persevere and argue with him. BEHAVE IN A MORE IMPROPER MANNER!

However, despite the fact that I agree with you, members of the gay and lesbian community have remained silent when we have gone too far, but they have backed off with their opinions for selfish reasons, which has resulted in pandemonium. I really apologize for this. It is necessary for all gays and lesbians, as well as those who have contributed, to apologize.

We must apologize for our intrution into demanding religion to accept our beliefs, this is the opposite of granting human rights; human rights belong to all people just not the new peverted LGBTQ+.

The evangelical community is responsible for more severe suffering and hatred than any other subtribe, and if and until all sides promote grownups who are willing to sit in the same room and discuss, the situation is going to become much more dire.

This chaos was going to come in some form or another, and it should not come as a surprise that the disorder that was lifted, gender ideology, is the perfect chaos because it generates not millions of dollars annually, but billions, and over the course of time, it will climb to trillions. There is no letup in the pandemonium despite the growing revenue.

As a conclusion, I would want to say that although I respect your viewpoint on religion, I do not share it. This is not something that should be used to stigmatize either you or me. To put my words into action, we need to hold individuals accountable and do what I say: ADULT BETTER.

The current social climate is characterized by a state of life and death turmoil, which can be attributed to a systematic shift in the manner in which our culture absorbs information. Add to that the enormous amount of money that has been pumped into it by the media, and voila! Transgender craze.

The issue is that in order to put a stop to it, the leaders who are capable of doing so are required to do so on their own, without any resources, and under continual attack. Not many people come that way anymore, so here we are. People don't come that way anymore. In a society that is falling apart into a mess, men are beginning to believe that they are women, the shame associated with pedophilia is being removed, and the degradation of society is being lifted.

Nevertheless, do you believe that religion or Christianity does not have a role in this discussion? Then you are mistaken.

On the flip side Christians would rather support activists who do nothing but set us back in time where different opinions were not allowed. Goes both ways.

Do we exist as human beings, devoid of opinions, or as subgroups within society? Each and every one of us is responsible for bringing us to this point, and we need each and every one of us to fix it.

Awaiting our coming together? In the future, children will continue to be slaughtered as a result of gender ideology and other cultural views that refuse to engage in argument or opinion.