Search Results

I worked in sales the majority of my adult life. Killed it in sales. Ever seen that hilarious Jeremy Piven movie The Goods in 2009 back when comedy was still legal? He’s a legendary car salesman closer. Well, that was me. He was Don “The Goods” Ready. I was Kellie “The Closer” King. I’ve got sales in my blood. My grandfather Scott King was a building contractor who opened the King’s Auto court motel in San Diego to coincide with the 1935 World’s Fair. In 1939 that became the Travelodge empire–a brilliant franchising scheme to rival the McDonald’s story of The Founder. My granddad used to pal around with Ray Kroc. He saw the brand new middle class market segment coming before anyone knew what hit them. The little bear that used to grace the logo? Modeled after my dad. I was also born in 1972. People talk about struggles now? Try being an ultra-successful alpha lesbian in the sales field in the 2000s and then tell me again about your adversity because someone didn’t respect your made-up “they/them” pronouns. I once got investigated for three months–all because I was beating every sales record there was amongst my peers, and we couldn’t let this bitch dyke do that, could we? See what I did there? I used a couple of slurs that, honestly, are my right to use as I’ve heard them for a lifetime against me. I saw the “dyke” word again recently after an appearance on the Stew Peters Show. Stew welcomed me on two days after Matt Walsh’s What is a Woman? exploded across the Twitterverse with 150 million views in 48 hours. Maybe “welcomed” isn’t the right word. It was pretty clear from the get-go that Stew’s self-righteousness blinds him to any conception that there isn’t any truth beyond his own–and that’s perfectly fine. It has nothing to do with me. It doesn’t even faze me anymore. And honestly, I will talk to the evangelicals all day long while they tell me about Jesus through their glares if it helps one baby lesbian somewhere know that they are perfect exactly as they are and that any attempt to sell them authentic happiness in the form of lifetime medicalization, endless surgeries and life-shortening hormones…maybe doesn’t have their best interest at heart? I get sales techniques. I know them intimately. As Mr. Stew hammered me with words about how I had “failed” and was “ruined” I thought about the Neuro-Linguistic Programming principles that he and so many newbie salespeople and pick-up artists use to try to arouse or elicit some kind of a reaction. It’s adorable, really. Reminds me of when I used to give a shit about such things. As he suggested to me that it was never too late to consider Jesus, I couldn’t help think about how many people miss out on these giant audiences because they’re so afraid of cancel culture cooties. You know the ones. Instead of Six Degrees of Kevin Bacon it’s Six Degrees of Tucker Carlson. Help Me Keep Using My Voice - Donate Today Activists against the marketing of transgenderism to children would no doubt hijack the Times Square teleprompter if they got the chance, even if it meant an evangelical was watching…wouldn’t they? I sure would. On the chiron thumbnail with Stew it blared “LGBT FREAKS TARGET OUR CHILDREN!” If you watch it, it’s cute when he tries to get me condemn not only Blaire White but Ted Cruz because they aren’t as far right as him. I said I want to put the surgeons who are targeting our kids in prison. Well, he wants them executed. Checkmate, Stew. There was for sure a time when all of this would have gotten to me. Or the people who write to me telling me that appearing on the show is unrecoverable. When the words of the people who tell me that I’m a traitor in every identity targeted segment one can be a traitor would have landed. That was during the time I lost myself. And it all began with that first lie that I accepted as truth–eight long years before Stew was telling me that Jesus was there and ready to listen, when I put my own identity up for debate. I don’t do that anymore. Even if Stew had the courage to call me an LGBT freak directly, it wouldn’t have mattered. Because I know who I am. I didn’t realize how absolutely crucial that is to a person’s entire sense of sanity. Who you are…is who you are. After spending nearly $1 million and having a stress induced heart attack and having to wear a “fragile” bracelet because I am that near death, I’m no longer worried about pleasing anyone. “We will call you Kellie King,” Stew bellows to me, “because that is as God intended.” I grin. I’m glad it is making him so happy. I could care as little about someone accurately sexing me as I do about them referring to me by my birth name. I don’t know if it’s “as God made me” (the way he says it drips off the tongue like a slur somehow, and I actually love being called Kellie) but it’s the truth, and I’m never offended by that anymore. I’m not one for religion, but I do believe in god. I do know one thing that saves–and that’s reality. Telling the truth. That’s what Stew and I have in common. We are allies. He is an ally to me in supporting the truth of telling the truth. You have to choose your battles. And to me the battle for reality is that crucial of a battle. He asks me to name and shame, name and shame. He is about the quick hit. I am a circus clown. He uses the word “clown.” His inflection is a dare. Will I react? I think Jesus would find him as entertaining as I do, how determined he is to out-Matt-Walsh Matt Walsh, how desperate he is to try to terrify me. I almost want to give him the tears he’s searching for out of pity, to help him meet his goal of a viral clip because I want to extend him that kindness. Be kind, right? Because I know he really, really thinks this performance matters and it will really, really make him happy. None of that matters. None of his politics matter. None of the politics matter of the people who decry him as “literal genocide” matter. Protecting children from the predation of multinational corporations who see them as cash cows matter. That’s it. One goal. I’m a one-trick pony now. “Who is the name of the doctor?” He puts my surgeon on the screen. I’m thrilled to see the guy blasted, having run from California with multiple lawsuits against him and his tail between his legs using Texas’s tort reform to continue his malpractice…on me. “Who was the name of your therapist?” I think back to the trans woman therapist that I first saw. I don’t even remember her name. I have no problem using trans pronouns, but I also 100 percent understand the reasoning why people do not. That therapist called me Kellie, too. I was Kellie. I was Kellie King. Successful, beautiful, a knockout. And then the magical thinking brain worm was first planted inside my head. Like an illusionist in Vegas, that first transwoman therapist I saw in 2016 told me that I had been presenting like a man my whole life. I felt…mortified. Shame I hadn’t felt since I was a kid. Could everyone see this? Why hadn’t anyone told me? This was a therapist. A medical professional. I’ve always respected medical professionals. Don’t you? At that point in time I was no cynic. Like so many others I was celebrating Caitlyn Jenner living her authentic truth. Finally, all the hatred against gays was melting away. Look at the love bombs coming the way of transgenders! Look at how amazing it was! I had never heard the term “astroturfing” in my life then. I probably hadn’t even heard the term “gaslight.” I certainly wasn’t familiar with the medical industry’s long history of corruption and capturing scandals from thalidomide to lobotomies to the oxycontin scandal that was at that time ramping up into high gear with the kind of completely guardrails-off marketing that would have made my granddad’s jaw drop. Lost in all of this are kids, who I relate to deeply, not just because I am a mother but because I am was the kind of kid that I see preyed upon today. I said it before, and I’ll say it as many times as I have to: I couldn’t resist this shit at 42. You think a little kid who believes in Santa Claus understands Judith Butler and Foucault when you are tell him that gender is a construct and if he likes playing with nail polish he needs to get his dick cut off? One thing I love about Matt Walsh is that he reminds me of the world that I grew up in, where you knew who you were dealing with. A black person once told me that they preferred the racism of the South because at least it was more honest. This is how I feel around evangelicals sometimes. I know the terror that the deeply religious feel about their dogma and faith, and it has absolutely nothing to do with me. They are doing their best within the context of their upbringing. And they know that sex and sex-change surgery…is for adults. The fact that this is controversial is terrifying. By Trans Regretter Scott Newgent

After Vetoing Gender-Affirming Care Ban, Ohio Gov. Signs Even Harsher Executive Order The recent Ohio state bill to ban childhood medical transition has sparked controversy and outrage among many. It is clear that this bill is nothing more than a political maneuver, with the governor initially vetoing it, only to sign it later on with additional restrictions. This back-and-forth decision-making only highlights the fact that this bill is not based on genuine concern for gender confused children, but rather a ploy for political gain. It is disheartening to see politicians using vulnerable communities as pawns in their political games. It is a clear indication that they are willing to sacrifice the rights and well-being of individuals for their own agendas. These politicians are preying on the ignorance and biases of society, and it is time for us to see through their tactics and stand up for what is right. We cannot let them continue to manipulate and control our beliefs and values. It is time to demand to keep kids safe regardless of if it hurts anyone's feelings about their neurotic gender identify! Ohio's implementation of stricter regulations for treating transgender youth. Instead of offering prompt affirmation, they now insist on six months of compulsory counseling for gender dysphoria. But remember the current psychology treatment of gender dysphoria is to instantly affirm and in some states NOT affirming could lead to disciplinary action up to losing their license's to treat patients. The new 'HARSH ADDED RESTRICTIONS' are for children to have a mandatory six months of instant reoccurring and unwavering affirmation that they can belong to society and medical transition is a cure all! Way to go Governor! Whew, I feel better now! The potential detrimental consequences of puberty blockers far surpass any other complications and adding cross sex hormones after pretty much solidifies these kids will be transitioned 100%. Moreover, it seems rather convenient that once these individuals complete their pharmaceutical transition journey, they magically reach the age of 18, coinciding perfectly with the timeline that would have occurred naturally! NO WIN HERE PEOPLE! SMOKE AND MIRRORS! This is beyond ridiculous. Yet, activists like Riley Gaines and others proudly claim credit for these so-called victories. But let me tell you, these are not victories at all. They are nothing but a joke. Unfortunately, when you're part of the activist circle, you have to play along. But for me, this is not a game. We are essentially sacrificing the well-being of children. Activists and organizations have found a new "Cash Cow" in the LGBTQ+ community, pretending that hate is spreading and urging people to donate. But the truth is, most people couldn't care less about your kids... PERIOD! Putting an end to this travesty requires a blueprint that nobody seems willing to sacrifice. Sure, there may be some initial progress, but then it's back to activist segregation. These subtribes, individuals like Riley Gaines and Senator Weiners in California who advocate for child/adult relationships, are essentially the same person with different beliefs. You see to win this? To get this out into society to evaluate where they stand does not happen with this strategic new-found activism due to social media. To WIN means to lose. What I accomplished in 'What is a Woman' was to dismantle activism by sacrificing myself, exposing my vulnerabilities, and in doing so, ensuring that I don't fit into any activist mold. And isn't that the whole point? I couldn't care less about being an activist. We are harming an entire generation of children with a flawed process that leads to serious long-term health issues, offers no real cure, and worsens mental health. These are undeniable facts, and anyone who truly examines the truth behind medical transitioning from a neutral standpoint will not see it as a good idea. The problem is that none of these activists actually want to bring about change, and why would they? Their source of income would disappear. I have been fighting tirelessly in the realm of activism for 5.5 years, standing alone without compromising my beliefs, and it has been an arduous journey. However, I am fully aware that if I had just six months with half of the nonsensical support that Riley received from the evangelical community, which only serves as an echo chamber for self-congratulation, the illusion of making a difference would crumble. I would break through these barriers. Yet, despite a press conference that garnered 25 million views, the mainstream media has chosen to ignore it, and we must question why. The reason is simple: I have the power to change hearts and minds, but it takes a toll on me. So go ahead and celebrate this phony, meaningless victory, but understand that these individuals are desperately seeking fame and fortune by pretending to make sacrifices. They are not. They are merely convincing their own subtribes that they are breaking down barriers and effecting change, when in reality, they are doing nothing but perpetuating a cycle. requires the support and unity of a strong subtribe that is willing to spread the truth and fight against the hidden carnage caused by medically transitioning children. I understand that not everyone may agree with my perspective, but the reality is that when the media can no longer hide the consequences of these actions. It is time for us to come together and put an end to this harmful practice. I am aware that speaking out against the mainstream narrative may not be popular, but I am not concerned with what people think. The truth needs to be exposed, and it is only a matter of time before the tide turns. Get your appointment today - Will not be helping parents during my long Sabbatical Unfortunately, I foresee a future where love for the LGBTQ+ community takes a drastic turn. The permission slips granted to the evangelicals will allow them to spread hate, and I can't entirely blame them for it. The LGBTQ+ movement has become a recruiting team for children, and it is truly disheartening. Due to these circumstances, I have made the decision to take a long sabbatical. My website will be transformed into a platform that announces a new societal subtribe. The information, studies, and facts will be removed because without a subtribe, there can be no support. Some Scars Don't Heal! Donate Today This new project is not one that I will be leading, but rather mentoring. It is time for me to focus on getting my life back on track. Sacrifice, for me, has meant living below the poverty line, residing in a moldy basement, and driving a car held together by tape. It has been a challenging journey, far from the luxurious lifestyle of some activists who have made millions. Being an activist may have its perks, but for me, it has been about making a genuine difference. In less than two weeks, my website and social media will undergo a transformation to support this new endeavor. I will step back from the spotlight, no longer posting on social media, engaging with the media, or being the go-to person for those struggling with detransition, suicidal thoughts, or concerned parents. In order to truly desire change and transcend the current political chaos, genuine sacrifice is essential. There are two crucial steps to accomplish this. Firstly, we must replace the current activist leaders with individuals who genuinely believe in sacrificing for the cause. Secondly, it is incumbent upon each and every one of us, including you, the reader, to amplify our voices beyond the confines of Twitter, at school meetings, rallies, and everywhere else! However, I have recently come to the realization that this may never come to fruition. Too many individuals are profiting immensely from both sides, making true sacrifice a rare commodity. I will soon be making an official announcement. To all those who have supported me throughout the past 5.5 years, I sincerely apologize if I failed your children, but I tried so much harder than people will ever realize! I failed! Thank you for your support and know I am still here, just taking along break and stepping away from the spotlight leading from behind. #SCREAMLouder 'Stop Transing Kids.' Sincerely, Regretter Scott Newgent

In the past three weeks, I have been fortunate enough to assist parents who are dealing with the challenges of having children going through gender confusion. One particular case involved a female-to-male individual who had started testosterone treatment without their parents' knowledge, causing a breakdown in communication between the father and his daughter. Since then, the courageous teenage daughter, who was eighteen and had the autonomy to make her own choices, has decided to stop taking testosterone. The guidance and support from her parents played a significant role in this decision, leading to her discontinuation of all synthetic hormone usage. Both the parents and the 18-year-old have come together and signed an agreement to pause any further medical transition for a period of nine months. This break will allow them to embark on an exploratory journey to fully understand the complexities associated with medical transition. It is crucial to acknowledge that this process is still in the experimental stage and can potentially result in severe health complications without offering any cure. Additionally, it has been observed that it may exacerbate existing mental health conditions. I have come to realize that achieving change in the childhood medical transition debate is an unattainable goal due to the prevailing activists on both ends and the overwhelming influx of donations towards LGBTQ+. Moreover, the evangelicals' gleaming smiles and impeccable appearance add to the complexity. The conservative side eagerly heralds their success with the resounding cry of 'Dinner Bell' donations: WE ARE SUCCEEDING when, in reality, NOTHING has changed! To be an activist, one requires a supportive subtribe, but the true challenge lies in remaining neutral while underscoring the profound impact on children. Please permit me to analyze yesterday's events and skillfully articulate my viewpoint. In the beginning, the governor of Ohio vetoed State Bill 68, which intended to halt all childhood medical transitions within the state. Subsequently, the bill entered into negotiations, leading to a purported compromise that banned surgery in minors while still allowing the usage of puberty blockers and synthetic cortex homes. “My child would have committed suicide.” Ohio governor explains his veto of the transgender care ban along with education, jobs for prisoners - Donate to the ACLU Today to Save Transgender Children" "Ohio House passes bill to ban trans youth from gender-affirming care, athletics - Donate to 'Turning Point' to SAVE Children from Childhood Medical Transition." Ohio House passes bill to ban trans youth from gender-affirming care, athletics Here is the analysis of WHY this compromise is a HUGE DISAPPOINTMENT for children but a victorious success for both parties, disregarding the children they neglected while engaging in unnecessary actions against all the children they abandoned. They show NO CONCERN! They simply don't care! Witness the alarming lifelong complications caused by Puberty Blockers, which devastate bone health and hinder brain development. The repercussions are so severe that they impede the growth of complex thinking abilities, prompting discussions about surgical interventions to mitigate the damage occurring in the brain. Furthermore, the administration of cross-sex hormones results in sterilization, blood disorders, heart disease, pulmonary embolisms, and a drastic increase in the risk of diabetes. Puberty blockers mark the initial phase, which entails the most complexities, while cross-sex hormones and surgeries conclude the subsequent stages. Moreover, puberty blockers yield the most significant financial gains, as they generate substantial revenue from this drug that essentially guarantees over 90% progression towards cross-sex hormones, just as the transition to surgeries looms on the horizon... Astonishing. The activists fighting to BAN childhood medical transition get their 'WINNING' headlines to ring the 'Donation Dinner Bell' and the LGBTQ+ rings the "Bigotry, Hate & Suicide' ringing the 'Donation Dinner Bell' for them as well. If you have been observant of my behavior, it should be clear that a notable transformation has taken place. This alteration can be credited to the recent State of OHIO Bill, which issued a mandate to halt all childhood gender surgeries. Nevertheless, ascertaining the ultimate truth is difficult as neither side can sway opinions and attitudes. The era of reliable information, authentic enthusiasm, and fair competition has vanished. I was on the verge of succumbing to the 'CORRUPTION' path of activism, compromising my stance and turning a blind eye to the mistakes of fellow activists. After enduring a devastating six-year nightmare, losing everything I had worked for, and suffering from deteriorating health, I allowed myself to hope for a brighter future. However, I overlooked the most crucial aspect. I have never truly belonged, and it seems that I never will, as I choose not to participate in the same strategies as these people. They are only focused on their own interests, treating activism as a mere transaction. I do not adhere to their profit-driven approach, as I have faith in something more meaningful in life. The truth is, if children are not secure in our society, everything else becomes insignificant; in such a scenario, we must all abandon our pursuits, and that is exactly what I am considering; I must embark on a journey of self-discovery to find this solution. It was a miscalculation to believe I could find my place, especially when I witnessed the betrayal and backstabbing once I was no longer helpful, causing conflicts with evangelical donors. My words and ideas were stolen, and the enormity of pain that allows me to convey a message, the hours and hours of physical pain that injects my passion and ability to analyze information and present it persuasively, was taken away from me. The only thing I excelled at was snatched, and who cares, right? As a lesbian who underwent a medical transition, it's acceptable for Christians to mistreat me, exploit me, and treat me like garbage. Is that what we call justice? But remember, as you hear speeches, listen for my voice because the odds are. The words were stolen from my mind and regurgitated to render more donations and speaking fees of over $20,000. Remember, that was my pain. Remember, that was my children's suffering. Remember, it was this pain that will probably steal the opportunity for me to meet my grandkids. Remember, it's a pain I endured and relentlessly refused to consent to the activists that you believe care and hold themselves to a higher Christian morality when the truth is I act more Christian than 99% of the Christians out there. I will end with how I started with the victory of one child that matters to me! Speaking to this child has reiterated what a tangled web we weave and the utter disgust we should have for both sides because the truth is that? The child I helped off the destructive path of medical transition? She is me, and I must remember that I matter, too! My time will be focused here, and I'll leave the ass-kissing to the evangelical Christians and the disgusting current LGBTQ+ leaders. I will remain telling the truth! by Transman Regretter Scott Newgent Donate To Work Here References: [^1^]: Steensma, T. D., & Cohen-Kettenis, P. T. (2011). Gender transitioning before puberty? Archives of Sexual Behavior, 40, 649–650. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-011-9752-2 [^2^]: Vrouenraets, L., Fredriks, A., Hannema, S., Cohen-Kettenis, P., & de Vries, M. (2020). Early Medical Treatment of Children and Adolescents With Gender Dysphoria: An Empirical Ethical Study. Journal of Adolescent Health, 57(4), 367-373. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2015.04.004 [^3^]: Wiepjes, C. M., Nota, N. M., de Blok, C. J. M., Klaver, M., de Vries, A. L. C., Wensing-Kruger, S. A., ... & den Heijer, M. (2018). The Amsterdam Cohort of Gender Dysphoria Study (1972-2015): Trends in Prevalence, Treatment, and Regrets. The Journal of Sexual Medicine, 15(4), 582-590. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsxm.2018.01.016 [^4^]: Sutcliffe, P. A., Dixon, S., Akehurst, R. L., Wilkinson, A., Shippam, A., White, S., … Round, J. (2017). Evaluation of surgical procedures for sex reassignment: a systematic review. Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery, 64(3), e1-e25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2010.10.032 [^5^]: Doherty, J., & Paterson, P. (2019). Organizational manipulation and moral disengagement: The creation of a climate for corruption in high-level English professional football clubs. Journal of Business Ethics, 159, 399–417. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-018-3819-2 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-011-9752-2 (2020, https://muse.jhu.edu/article/774687) https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1300/J082v51n03_02). GLQ: A Journal of Lesbian and Gay Studies. https://doi.org/10.1215/10642684-2-3-300). (Olson-Kennedy J, Warus J, Okonta V, Belzer M, Clark LF. (2018). "Medical Mistrust Among Transgender Adolescents: Implications for Child Abuse Pediatricians". Child Abuse & Neglect. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2018.07.005).

In this time of prevalent social activism, skepticism around its operation is on the rise. Ostensibly, activism pledges to bring about serious societal reform. Yet, a somewhat disturbing view insists that present day activists ensure no change occurs, thus amplifying their bargaining strength for heightened financial incentives. This raises questions about the efficacy of those who are campaigning for social justice, but seem more focused on personal financial gain (Strauss, 2014). My exposure to activism was entirely inadvertent and driven by one solitary and staunch motive: Ending childhood medical transition worldwide. This transformation is being pawned off onto impressionable children under the guise of transgenderism and I've had enough. I've watched this unfold, I've lived through it, and now I stand against it. The so-called "activism market" is a peculiar beast. Unlike conventional professions, the value of activism seems inversely proportional to its efficacy; those who fail to evoke change somehow find a way to financially flourish (Biddix, 2010). This counterintuitive dynamic can be attributed to two key factors. First, the longer a social issue persists, the longer activists can exploit the situation for monetary gain, as proponents manipulate the issue to ensure the struggle and associated income, endures (Boggs, 2011). Second, when change is glacial, activists lay claim to the enormity and complexity of the issue to validate the need for additional resources, including financial compensation (McCarthy & Zald, 1977). Take a look at Ethiopia, deemed the poster child for famine, the nation has been siphoning off donations for over 30 years with little change (Belachew & Jember, 2014). Similarly, stateside, groups like Black Lives Matter, with a crusade against racial prejudice, have witnessed a financial windfall yet have reached few milestones in terms of policy change (Brooks, 2016). The respected activist, Riley Gaines, is another participant in this shameful enterprise. Gaines may be recognized as a competitive swimmer who was pit against a transwoman, leading to missed opportunities and a life that spiraled out of control. Her quick ascent to fame and the launch of her nonprofit have established her as a formidable opponent. Her team extended an invitation to me over a year ago to join forces in this endeavor. I was told I would be handsomely compensated for my speeches, however, a month before the tour, they ghosted me leaving me with more questions than answers. Unlike Gaines, my activism is funded purely by donations. Last year, my campaign gathered $22,000 directly contributing to my living expenses and travels in efforts to raise awareness on this topic. The lack of communication from Gaines' team has left me in quite a tight financial spot and I am left to question her motives. I firmly believe we deserve better activists, ones driven by justice and reform rather than personal gain. Let's strive for more authenticity, more dedication and more genuine change in the world of social activism and hold these activists to the fire to inspire change because from the way I see it? No one wants changes that you currently follow. 545% Increase of LGBTQ Characters On TV With over 50% being transgender Riley talks about sacrifices. Open your books, and I guarantee her W2 for 2022is WELL over what a dentist would make & hitting the million mark, the career she walked away from, she's treated like a star, speeches are written for her, Charlie Kirk's people train her, she flies around the worlds hearing what a hero she is and...AND trans people hate her? Is that the sacrifice? Being wheeled away from the CRAZY people you hated anyway! Where's the sacrifice, Riley? Cause I don't see it! NOT A GAME WE ARE BUTCHERING KIDS! Quote the studies, Riley, analyze the data, show us your pain. Did you stumble upon an opportunity, aligning with 'Turning Point'? You possess the ideal looks and beliefs to champion Christianity and conservatism, a leader to be celebrated, facilitating cash flow, because let's be honest! The fact is that conservatives already agree with Riley, Christians already align with Riley. It's clear in 2023 that this kind of activism earns substantial revenue but changes nothing. Now, place Riley in a room full of liberals who instantly dismiss Riley, disregarding whatever she says. I said yes to Riley, as together, we alter the room dynamics; me and Riley, a medically transitioned lesbian, a non-Christian, and Riley... that would genuinely change hearts and minds. However, a nagging feeling tells me that resistance from her Christian base led us here. It's disheartening because if halting childhood medical transition is the aim, grant me 25% of the platform Riley has been given, and I assure you, although I may offend many, I would halt the irrationality of transitioning children medically. Therefore my question is, what is your actual desire...To safeguard children or to forge a potent tribe that alters NOTHING?" Nineteen State Bills Passed in 2023 - Only 2 are currently being enforced - Kind of still allowing puberty blockers But people will keep stealing from each other, treating people terrible to ensure a good public image, but for me? I don't CARE what people think, we are BUTCHERING a generation of children and sure make a living at it...Just don't suck at it and tell every one you are creating change. Riley is for Riley and that's the truth! I firmly believe we deserve better activists, ones driven by justice and reform rather than personal gain. Let's strive for more authenticity, more dedication, and more genuine change in the world of social activism. Open your books, Riley. Let's see how much sacrificing you have done. Show us the pain, because I can show you mine! I may piss people off with truth but one thing you can guarantee I have one motive - 'STOP Transing Kids!' Support My Work If You Agree We need to be told the truth as a society and the truth is that we are LOSING to fight to stop childhood medical transition Losing in the Entertainment Field 2016 Numbers of LGBTQ Characters On Prime Time 142 LGBTQ characters, regular and recurring. 2023 2016 Numbers of LGBTQ Characters On Prime Time 775 Current Numbers of LGBTQ Characters On Prime Time 545% Increase of LGBTQ Characters On TV With over 50% being transgender Losing in court & legal suits Nineteen State Bills Passed in 2023 - Only 2 are currently being enforced - Kind of still allowing puberty blockers Supreme Court lets gender dysphoria ruling stand in win for transgender rights The U.S. Supreme Court on Friday let stand a federal appeals court ruling that found people with gender dysphoria should be protected against discrimination under the Americans With Disabilities Act (ADA). Supreme Court Lets Gender Dysphoria Ruling Stand in Win for Transgender Rights Transgender child speaks out ahead of Ohio trans care ban decision They have NOTHING to be scared of. Nineteen bills have been passed to BAN childhood medical transition, only two being enforced...KINDA they are allowing puberty blockers Watch AOC Defend Transgender Americans in Heated Congressional Hearing TEXAS GENDER-AFFIRMING CARE BAN TAKES EFFECT NA NA - Denied! Riley Gaines Vows to Fight the New 'War on Women' in 2024 Amid Backlash - Where is the win? Science YET the Conservative ACTIVISTs CHEER In Victory! Transgender UW-Madison Employees Win Insurance Coverage Fight Win health insurance coverage back USA Boxing's 2024 rule book states that any male who transitions to identify as a woman will be eligible to compete in a traditionally female category. Transwomen to compete with biological women - Guess what? Conservatives push back, again and again and again, but LOSE! 2023 Review: Transgender movement grew bolder amid backlash Trans influencer Dylan Mulvaney listed in Forbes’ '30 Under 30’ list NFL's first transgender cheerleader says 'I’m really changing the world' National Organization for Women says, 'Trans women are women' Transgender Miss Portugal and Miss Netherlands poised to compete for Miss Universe On Transgender Day of Visibility, White House announces moves to expand trans rights

by, Transregretters Donate Today As 2024 comes closer, so does STATE Bill Season I am writing to bring your attention to a pressing issue that demands our immediate action and collective efforts. It concerns the practice of childhood medical transition, specifically the medicalization of gender-confused children. In 2022, one state took a significant step forward by passing a law to ban childhood medical transition. Encouraged by this progress, we looked forward to continued positive developments in 2023. However, upon closer examination, we discovered that out of the nineteen states that have implemented bans, only two are actively taking measures to prevent the medicalization of gender-confused children. This situation is deeply concerning and raises serious questions about our current approach. We must acknowledge that what we have been doing thus far is failing to serve the best interests of these vulnerable children. Therefore, I implore you to consider adopting a different strategy in 2024, one that addresses the root causes and steers away from promoting social media stars as experts or serving political agendas. It is disheartening to witness politics dominating the conversation while the true welfare of these children remains neglected. We must prioritize their well-being over any personal or political motivations. In light of this, I urge you to support individuals or organizations that are genuinely committed to the cause and have the compassion and empathy required to make a meaningful difference in the lives of these children. The orgs we are up against It is crucial to recognize that the current situation demands immediate action. Out of the nineteen existing bans on childhood medical transition, only two states are actively enforcing them. This alarming statistic underscores the urgent need for widespread implementation and enforcement of these laws across the nation. I implore you to join me in making 2024 a year of genuine change and progress. Let us channel our efforts towards supporting initiatives that genuinely prioritize the welfare of gender-confused children. Together, we can make a significant impact and save countless lives. I sincerely hope that you will consider my plea and take the necessary steps to redirect your support and resources in 2024. By doing so, we can help create a society that fosters love, acceptance, and understanding for all individuals, especially children grappling with their gender identity. Thank you for your time and consideration. I look forward to your positive response and collaboration in this crucial undertaking. Yours sincerely, Transregretters Donate Today

Dallas Morning News - EXCLUSIVE Several weeks ago, the prestigious New York Times invited submissions on the topic of regret. Intrigued, I eagerly seized the opportunity to delve into my personal journey of medical transitioning and the profound regret it has brought me. With utmost sincerity, I poured my heart and soul into crafting a piece that encapsulated the raw emotions and complexities surrounding this deeply personal experience. Little did I know that my words would prove to be too potent, too authentic for the esteemed pages of The New York Times. Filled with anticipation, I submitted my piece and patiently awaited its fate. To my surprise, the following week, the NYT unveiled their selection of regret-themed articles. While I commend them for their discerning eye, I couldn't help but feel a pang of disappointment. The chosen piece, in stark contrast to mine, trivialized the weighty decision of medical transitioning by drawing an absurd comparison to a mere choice of swimming competitively. New York Times Piece On Regret It is no wonder that my opinion piece has faced relentless criticism. It has been dragged through the mud, perhaps because it dared to expose the truth. Perhaps my words were too powerful, too real for the confines of The New York Times. But let me assure you, dear reader, that my regret is not something to be dismissed lightly. It is a profound and deeply personal struggle that deserves to be heard. So, while the NYT may have shied away from my unfiltered truth, I implore you to seek out my exclusive piece, where I lay bare the untold story of Scott Newgent's transition regret. Don't let the silence of the mainstream media deter you. Discover the unfiltered truth that the New York Times didn't want you to read. Scott Newgent's Transition Regret - Unveiling the Untold Story! Dallas Morning News Link "You're the transman Scott Newgent, from the ‘What Is a Woman’ documentary, right? Don’t we know each other?” I immediately look down to avoid eye contact. It's one thing to be remembered for a great success in life. It’s quite another to be recognized for the single most significant regret you have, one that never releases its grip, leading to a life mirroring the Biblical Job: unending physical and mental health trials as well as financial tribulations. And I say that as an agnostic. The woman refuses to leave my table at a coffee shop where I am desperately looking for a work-from-home job, as I’m now without the finances for a car. Her insistence forces me to look up and I recognize her. I have, indeed, met this woman and her husband and children — the type of meeting that only happens once but leaves a soul forever changed. Years prior, I had visited them in their home in an effort to sell them vinyl windows. Due to complications from gender-affirming medical transition, I was struggling with urinary infections that were nonstop for 17 months. I’d had a phalloplasty, otherwise known as “bottom surgery.” That’s the last, most drastic, and least successful type of gender-affirming surgery available, but the number of people undergoing it is skyrocketing. According to a study published this summer by JAMA Network Open, gender-affirming surgeries almost tripled between 2016 and 2019. Most of those were “top surgeries” — removal or changes to breasts — but 16,871 of them were genital surgeries, including hundreds of minors. For me, gender transition was and continues to be dangerous, causing massive and recurring health issues. It cured nothing. It gave me PTSD. My left arm, from which the skin was taken to create a faux phallus, has essentially left me disabled. My right arm — my good arm — recently was diagnosed with hairline fractures because I stopped taking testosterone a little while ago. I basically now have brittle bones decades too soon. I needed that job selling windows for the health insurance, which would cover a procedure out of state. My own state didn’t have a qualified surgeon willing to take on the complications from my surgery. So I fluttered from one ER to the next, weekend after weekend, working five days in between. I had to endure three months of ring-around-the-ER-posey. This game I was forced to play left me with lasting financial debt that I will never be able to repay — yet another regret. The insistent infections had taken their toll on my health, both physically and emotionally. A month prior, a doctor insisted I get a PICC line. This tube traveled up my arm and ended right at the entrance of my heart, remaining for over 30 days. Each day, I would wake up, go to the hospital and receive IV antibiotics before I headed off to sell windows in people's homes. Donate a SCREAM Today I distinctly recall the pain I had felt as an infection pulled on my bladder like daggers. I was giving my presentation, saying "Here is the latch that opens the windows," when the woman interrupted me: "Scott, sweetie, you have blood running down your legs.” The kindness and genuine concern I felt from this couple, despite being strangers at the time, created a sense of comfort I will never forget. Their rare empathy hit a nerve, and I could not stop the tears I knew were coming. Once they started to flow, they didn't stop. I could not catch my breath, hyperventilating into the embrace of this woman and her husband. It was in his strong grasp I lost the ability to stand, yet I stayed upright because he held me along with his wife as his mammoth arms encircled us both. It was this nurturing man who began to comfort me in a whisper, "Shhh, it's ok, Scott, it's gonna be ok, you're ok, let it out." He reminded me of my father, who’d passed away a decade prior. Even though we were the same age, I felt from him a fatherly love I clearly must have needed. I was so grateful. The woman in the coffee shop is still there, smiling at me, oblivious to the regrets that flash through my mind. "Oh my, Scott, how are you? We saw you in the documentary and were so thankful to see you alive; we have been worried about you for years. How are you now? Scott, what powerful testimony you have and are giving to so many." I look up at the expectant woman to give her my answer. “How am I? I’m still alive. And I live for my three kids.” When I was at my lowest, I thought about giving up entirely. But my kids’ faces came before and I made a promise: to live and to tell others about what happened to me. I’m far from perfect, as a person and as a parent. But I try. I try to help others so they don’t have the regrets that I have. My most major regret — having experimental bottom surgery — led to a cascade of others. About five years ago, I began a fight to stop childhood medical transition. I started by helping write the first bill that was heard in North Dakota and have not relented, becoming one of the leading worldwide voices to stop this experimental practice. Yes, a transman is leading the fight, and that in itself should give the medical community pause. The obligation has weighed heavily on my family. I have been let go from good-paying jobs because of my activism. I’m crippled with debt. I’m trans and I cannot detransition, even though I’d like to. The process has gone too far; there is no turning back. And so all I can do is try to be as resilient as Job, even though I understand no better. The couple smiles and wishes me well. I go back to looking at the want-ads with the free wifi from the coffee shop. I’m still an agnostic, but I’m also better off than Job. -by Transman Regretter Scott Newgent I Can HELP! Reach out TODAY!

An Examination of Lupron Pharmaceuticals: Delinquity, Repercussions, and Ethical Consequences Help STOP Childhood Medical Transition. Consider a donation today: Lupron Pharmaceuticals, a renowned conglomerate in the pharmaceutical industry, has often been hailed as a panacea provider across varied medical concerns. However, in recent times, the company’s repute found itself immured within lawsuits and criminal charges. What hitherto appeared a magnanimous medical saviour soon manifested itself as an ethically warped enterprise. Let's embark on a journey to scrutinise Lupron Pharmaceuticals, their unethical exploits for profit, the consequent penalties imposed, and the overarching implications of such conduct on the pharmaceutical panorama. In 2020, Lupron Pharmaceuticals was indicted in the United States for multiple counts of criminal offences, specifically bribery and false advertising, leading to an astounding financial penalty of $874 million (US Justice, 2020)[1]. This egregious misconduct not only cast aspersions on the ethical foundations of the company but also was a stark revelation of lupine tendencies within a supposed healer. Brobdingnagian as it may appear, the fine imposed on Lupron Pharmaceuticals is reflective of the magnitude of corruption they actively participated in. The company was reported to have paid millions in kickbacks to doctors across America, essentially bribing them to prescribe their medication over their counterparts (US Justice, 2020)[1]. Furthermore, they were penalised for false advertising, which allowed them an unfair competitive edge, misleading patients into selecting their products under fraudulent pretensions (Federal Trade Commission, 2020)[2]. It is crucial to understand that such rampant bribing and corruption directly impact the sanctity of patient care. There exists an unspoken trust between the patient and the healthcare providers, expecting them to prioritise patients' welfare over monetary profits. However, when medical decisions are influenced by bribes, it shatters this faith, undermining the very essence of the healthcare system (Harvard Business Review, 2017)[3]. Lupron Pharmaceutical's false advertising tactics added fuel to the roaring fire of their unethical conduct. They capitalised on the vulnerability of patients, presenting misleading information in a bid to generate increased sales and market dominance. False advertising in healthcare is particularly nefarious as it not only misleads consumers but can also potentially cause health-related harm (Consumer Protection, 2002)[4]. Legal actions against Lupron Pharmaceuticals mark a significant standpoint in the battle against corruption and unethical practices in the pharmaceutical field. The hefty fine has signalled other corporations that engaging in similar misconduct will not be treated lightly and will bear severe punitive consequences (US Justice, 2020)[1]. Simultaneously, the Lupron case serves as a potent reminder for pharmaceutical companies of their ethical responsibilities. The mission to maintain an unabridged commitment to patient wellbeing must supersede profits and commercial gains (The Pharmaceutical Journal, 2014)[5]. Is there an antidote to such rampantly growing unethical behaviour? Regulation and stringent legal actions indeed act as potent deterrents. However, fostering a culture of ethical responsibility across all echelons of such corporations can play an instrumental role in preventing such misdemeanours. Ethical training and transparency ought to be the two strong pillars on which pharmaceutical companies should build their foundations. Pharmaceuticals incident underscores the corporate misdemeanours lurking in the pharmaceutical industry, it also offers a viable blueprint for both prevention and rectification. It is an earnest appeal to all entities across the healthcare spectrum to refocus on their ethical responsibilities and honour the trust vested in them by patients worldwide, ensuring their interests always take precedence over any corporate profit. References: [1] US Justice (2020). "Global Resolution of Criminal and Civil investigations". Available at: https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/pharmaceutical-company-targeting-elderly-victims-admits-its-drug-ads-falsely-claimed-safety [2] Federal Trade Commission. (2020). "False Advertising and the FTC". Available at: https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/media-resources/truth-advertising [3] Harvard Business Review. (2017). "How Corruption Undermines the Healthcare System". Available at: https://hbr.org/2017/02/study-how-corruption-undermines-healthcare-systems. [4] Consumer Protection. (2002). "Unfair and Deceptive Practice in Advertising". Available at: https://www.consumer.ftc.gov/articles/0061-banned-deceptive-advertising [5] The Pharmaceutical Journal. (2014). “Ethics in Pharmaceutical Issues”. Available at: https://www.pharmaceutical-journal.com/news-and-analysis/ethics-in-pharmaceutical-issues/20066278.article?firstPass=false

There are various levels to experiencing regret. Embracing that regret and acknowledging your actions also involve multiple layers! However, the only form of regret that is warmly embraced is when one declares their detransition and aligns themselves with the evangelicals and feminists. Regrettably, society remains unaware that the majority of these young adults who identify as DETRANS are still in search of acceptance while grappling with significant mental health challenges. They desperately grasp at any possible solution to alleviate the burden of depression, constantly swinging from one extreme to another. If the DETRANS are not receiving sufficient attention to suppress depression? They take it a step further by announcing they are a "Born Again," and the evangelicals respond with both financial support and the necessary attention to keep the depression at bay. However, the depression never truly disappears; in fact, this constant swinging exacerbates the situation for these young adults. Essentially, these individuals transitioned from a difficult situation to an even more challenging one, as trans activists hailed them as heroes and exploited their experiences to advance their agenda. Similarly, evangelicals and feminists do the exact opposite. The well-being of these young adults is not a priority; the primary focus is on winning the battle of activism. I have helped hundreds of parents navigate the complex world of "Mom/Dad I am really a man/woman" & I can help you too! Reach out today People must grasp the true nature of the leaders in the activism movement. Contrary to popular belief, their concern level differs from what they portray. Activism has become a lucrative business, with detrans being the latest cash cow. It reminds me of being in business sales, and all the salespeople are clawing at each other to unlock a $150,000 quarterly bonus. It's horrendous because we are dealing with wounded people already, lied to once, and then lied to again. Yet these activists are willing to go to any lengths to maintain their financial gains, even if it means scorning the well-being of others. Upholding moral values necessitates engaging in authentic discussions, where the flaws in their agenda are highlighted and opposing viewpoints are welcomed. However, it seems that allowing such debates is not something these activists are willing to do. Their primary motivation is monetary gain, and they have undeniably achieved success in that aspect. Some individuals manage to earn millions of dollars annually simply by speaking at events, all the while claiming to have selflessly given up their careers. But let's not forget the hefty price tag of $15,000 they charge for a thirty-minute speech. Moreover, when they find themselves in the company of those who have supported them and helped them financially, they treat them with disdain, ordering expensive bottles of champagne worth $150 and expressing disgust at having to share a meal with those who have uplifted their words. It's genuinely repulsive, and honestly, these individuals are the ones leading this agenda! It is clear that their intentions are anything but assisting children or safeguarding women's sports or rights. Be confident once the excitement dies down in approximately a decade and my book hits the shelves, the shocking truth will be unveiled, akin to the notorious saga of Britney Spears and Justin Timberlake. If you genuinely grasped the real essence of these advocates, you would be entirely repulsed by the type of people they are. Let me reiterate: To succeed in activism, one must prioritize effectiveness over empathy, disregarding the harm caused to others. It is crucial to avoid engaging in genuine debates and focus on maintaining a social media presence. Although this approach may benefit the sole activist, witnessing our humanity's sickening and disturbing aspects is disheartening, leading me to question my desire to distance myself from it entirely. It's wholly DISTURBED and reveals a dark aspect of society that is revolting to the extent where I'm compelled to ask, "Where can I find a hideout far away from civilization because there is no goodness left!" Regret encompasses various levels, but are only certain levels being acknowledged at present? The dichotomy of Black or White leads to success for a select few while causing devastation for those who conceal their anguish in silence. Speaking out about regret without adhering to the black/white narrative would subject these young adults to brutal attacks. Considering all the points mentioned, I recently engaged in a thought-provoking discussion with a feminist who raised concerns about my failure to mention DETRANS during my Tuesday night "Ask Scott" session. This particular session aims to assist parents in comprehending and effectively parenting amidst the chaos caused by gender ideology. The feminist I encountered questioned me, suggesting that I endorse transgenderism by continuing to use transman. I attempted to clarify my stance on why I don't exclude 'transman' and why I don't support detransitioners who are under 25 or those who detransitioned within three years after turning 25. Medical transition is an irreversible process; I can never revert back to my previous self, and advocating against it is equivalent to endorsing medical transition as a universal solution! Medical transition is an action; it involves cosmetic surgeries that do not provide a cure and can lead to significant health complications. Moreover, it is highly likely that it will exacerbate mental health issues. Promoting the idea that these young individuals, who have transformed their identities, can somehow become who they would have been is equally harmful in the opposite direction. Witness the undeniable truth that shatters the rhetoric employed by both feminists and evangelicals. It is truly astonishing to realize that these two seemingly opposing factions actually stand united. Although their objectives may vary, the battles they wage and the strategies they employ are remarkably similar. This revelation is nothing short of captivating! My sole objective revolves around rescuing these children and shifting the focus away from the internal dynamics of subtribes. Instead of seeking power and prestige within these subtribes, we should prioritize raising awareness among those outside and garnering their attention. The current situation resembles an echo chamber, where the same celebrity status continuously circulates among subtribes, achieving nothing substantial and leaving no lasting impact on anyone. The news stories highlighting these children who declare DETRANS may initially bring them glamour and importance, but unfortunately, society quickly forgets about them. From my personal experience, these children end up right back where they started, struggling with their mental well-being and unable to cope with life. Only a few overcome these challenges and succeed, which would surprise many. I know about these trials because I seem to be the only safe place for these young adults to fall, never judging! These young adults deserve the freedom to make their own choices regarding detransitioning, based on what brings them inner peace. It's important to acknowledge that synthetic hormones have long-lasting effects, and it's unfair to expect these individuals to spend their entire lives correcting pronouns just to fit someone else's agenda. Love and support should be about understanding and accepting each person's unique journey. It's crucial to remember that life is not always black and white, especially when it comes to the experiences of DETRANS. When the lights dim and their stories are shared, that's when the real work begins. It's at this point that individuals realize the confines of detransition or medical transition, and the fact that they have been relying on the exhilaration of hearing repeated and constant affirmations like, 'You are a HERO.' However, they come to understand that maintaining the HERO status may not be sustainable. For instance, a young woman who has taken testosterone for four years may continue to appear masculine unless she undergoes the painful process of reversing the changes, resorting to plastic surgery in a desperate attempt to achieve a more feminine appearance. On the other hand, what about the young woman who doesn't wish to undergo plastic surgery? They understand that remaining where they are, without taking synthetic hormones for the rest of their lives, means they will continue to look like a seventeen-year-old boy indefinitely. In such situations, where can they turn to for support and guidance? I have remained steadfast for over five years in my decision not to join the detrans train, even after ceasing testosterone for a long period. What if I were motivated by financial gain or fame? In that case, this would have been the path to pursue. However, I have chosen to stand my ground and stay true to my convictions. I am feeling completely overwhelmed by the recent fracture in my wrist and the issues with my bones. It feels like I am trapped in a whirlwind of uncertainty. I am torn between two choices: should I stop taking testosterone and risk having weak bones at the age of 51, or should I follow my doctor's advice and continue with testosterone, even though they themselves are unsure of what else to do? It is frustrating to think that my medical transition is portrayed as safe, effective, and a miraculous solution, while I experience the harsh realities of these falsehoods every day! Each step towards better health only serves as a reminder of the challenges of medical transition, while society is fed unrealistic expectations. It is imperative that we, as responsible adults, prioritize the well-being of these deceived youngsters over our own selfish desires to prove ourselves right or gain social recognition through exploiting their situation. Let us not turn a blind eye to the harsh reality that these young adults are merely pawns in a temporary game. They are continuously sacrificed for the benefit of a privileged few, solely for their financial gains. Is this truly the moral stance we should uphold? Imagine the allure of a fleeting moment of fame, where you proudly proclaim, "Behold, the miracle of Christ! He has saved this young adult!" But let's delve deeper into the reality behind this facade. In truth, these individuals are struggling to overcome their pain, and the one who claims to bring them salvation is merely paving the way for future suffering. By exploiting these young adults, they are pushing them further into a dark abyss of insignificance, making them mere pawns in the game of activism. This is the harsh reality that cannot be ignored. I do not oppose detransition, but I am concerned about the negative consequences it can have. It's important to remember that facts are impartial and do not consider our desires or emotions. While we may hope for detransitioners to have successful and fulfilling lives, the reality is that many of them face challenges. I have consistently shown my support for detransitioners and have actively worked towards promoting a deeper understanding of the permanence of medical transition. However, my involvement with Detrans is kept private because, for me, their well-being is more important than seeking attention, fame, or fortune. I endure significant hardships for this cause. I strive to be a safe haven for those in need, even though there are times when I am tempted to pursue personal gain. But what would that make me? I refuse to compromise my principles because I am not an ordinary activist who simply speaks within an echo chamber, achieving nothing and only benefiting myself! This is why I strive to go beyond these echo chambers and engage with individuals who may not share my perspectives. I am authentic in my intentions, and if you were to experience my life or be a part of it, you would comprehend the profound sincerity within me. I am indifferent to whom I converse with or if I offend anyone from a specific group or subculture. I genuinely do not care, and people can perceive that, which is why I am able to change hearts and minds. How? People believe in me and can sense my sincerity. I not only express rational truths, but I also convey these truths with a raw emotional intensity, making people truly understand the realities of these stances and ultimately winning their hearts and minds. Changing hearts and minds should be the primary focus of every endeavor, a mission deeply rooted in significance, an injustice that demands rectification and can only be achieved through selflessness; these ought to be the principles upheld by activists; unfortunately, they are seldom witnessed. Having expressed all these thoughts, the woman who confronted me appeared genuine and made me contemplate; she possessed an uncommon and authentic enthusiasm. The woman I encountered was sincerely overflowing with passion of her truth. Although she may have displayed some toughness, it is crucial to remember that nobody is perfect. Nonetheless, I could sense her genuine sincerity. Following an extensive introspective journey to ascertain what is genuinely righteousness, rather than merely convenient, I have ultimately arrived at a compromise that I trust will be satisfactory and that I pray can bring unity, allowing us to break barriers, shatter the limitations of echo chambers that ensure more children will be butchered because of the absurdity of gender ideology...Longer! As I was searching, a friend called me and convinced me that feminists and others wanted to embrace me and help within this activism as a team, and I like that too; I do. After all, I may look male, but I am a woman, and I need emotional support as well as financial support to continue. I cannot continue the way I am, ALONE! This has been a period of five years filled with introspection. What is the correct course of action? Not the simple, not the profitable, but the morally right thing to do? I have made a choice to refrain from using 'Detransitioner' and instead opt for 'Regretter,' yet keep transman with regrettor following all from now on. I will continue to identify as a transman to emphasize the significance of undergoing medical transition, which is a permanent change. It serves as a means to educate others that I can never revert to who I once was, and being a transman is not a cause for celebration but rather a personal journey of penance. I strongly advocate for acknowledging the undeniable truth and labeling 'regretter' after transman, in order to raise awareness that being a transman is not something to be celebrated, but rather a genuine experience that some individuals may regret. By doing so, we can encourage others to step forward and openly express their regrets within a society that often overlooks the complexities of this issue. It is crucial to create a safe and inclusive space where individuals can find solace and share their stories, ultimately fostering understanding and empathy. Together, we can educate others, adapt to new perspectives, and drive meaningful change that goes beyond superficial engagement such as mere clicks or likes. I have faced criticism for continueing to use "Scott," which happens to be a male name. However, what people fail to realize is that my family has affectionately referred to me as little Scott for most of my life. This name holds sentimental value as it was my father's name, and I share many similarities with him. Moreover, the name Scott Newgent has gained recognition within the activist community, making it unreasonable to abandon it after investing five years. Let's find a middle ground that satisfies everyone. With that said, feel free to use Kellie if you like. I am announcing that I am a Transman Regretter! by Transman Regretter Scott Newgent #SCREAMLouder http://ScottNewgent.com

Support Work Here: Donate by, Transman Regretter Not Scott Newgent For hundreds, if not thousands of years, the Catholic Church has been an undeniable pillar of moral and spiritual guidance for those who held its tenants dear. This beacon of faith has sailed its ship unscathed through the tumultuous seas of societal evolution, never once bending to the changing winds (https://www.pewresearch.org/). Except, of course, in the case of 'Divorce Excuse,' wherein it circumvented its rigid stance for granting a divorce on the grounds of a 'defective church contract', masking near scurrilous practices. Some would argue it is a manoeuvre motivated by the substantial financial gains such concessions brought (DeGirolami, 2020; https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/). I would have to agree with having been married to a devout evangelical Catholic. The Catholic Church, an institution with profound historical significance, holds onto various traditions and rules rooted deeply within its doctrine. However, these doctrines, particularly those concerning the prohibition of women from assuming the priesthood, have long been the epicentre of countless debates, with many viewing them as inherently misogynistic. Yet, the Catholic church stands firm. The evolution of the Catholic Church and Marriage is one of the few doctrine changes, and for some, this firm stance without a waiver is a draw. But recently? Pope Francis seems to believe he can throw thousands of years up in the air because of the pressure of the NEW LGBTQ+. Parallelly, living in a world gradually marching towards acceptance and equality, we see the LGBTQ+ community, an embodiment of sexual diversity, claiming its rightful place amidst society. The group has persistently thrived on its stance of celebrating individuality, mandating the mind, not biology, as the determinant of gender as advocated by its postulates (Spade, 2015; https://scholarship.law.duke.edu/). But, herein arises a problem. Just as one is entitled to religious freedom, with people freely cherishing the belief of an Old Man in the sky orchestrating the affairs of life, one should be equally entitled to exercise their beliefs related to sexuality. This is not a call for hostility but an appeal for the right to healthy disagreement (Boyle, 2019; Url: https://link.springer.com/) an both should live in peace with no need to taint the other. It's okay for subtribes to disagree. It's essential in a balanced society. The craziness of medically transitioning children is the result of ignorance and censorship. Without the censors, no human being ALIVE would be for medically transitioning children! Period.... MIC DROP! Yet it is uncanny how the Catholic Church and the LGBTQ+ community, concurrent yet contrasting ideologies, reveal an unspoken similarity when placed under a focused dissection. Both advocate individual belief systems, reliant on faith with copious fervour; both serve as foundations upon which individuals build their identities. Moreover, both mirror each other in the manner they wield their dissent-proof shields. Questioning or challenging either institution has, more often than not, resulted in dire consequences. Such dynamics reiterate that both the Catholic Church and LGBTQ+ are not simply systems grounded on verifiable facts but are ideologies spanning not just faith or orientation but culture, values and lifestyle. On one end, we have the church, a repository of age-old wisdom and traditional moral values, positing a Supreme Being as the explanation for life. On the other end stands the LGBTQ+ community, a beacon of change and acceptance, advocating the fluidity of gender based on the individual's psychological reality. The doctrines of the LGBTQ+ group seem as esoteric to the conventional thinker as the concept of changing genders seems to the LGBTQ+ community (Robinson, 2020; Url: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/). Thus, the Catholic Church and the LGBTQ+ community, as much as they seem to be on opposite spectrums, ironically defend their constituents' identities by drawing an impregnable boundary around their assets, safeguarding them from the harsh climates of societal scorn and discrimination. Further, this implies their ideologies, despite their distinctive beliefs, are structured on equivalent pillars- faith, identity, conviction, protection, and survival. As an ideology, religion is social by nature, versatile in its interpretations and often entirely subjective in its application. Some ideologies are set in stone, while others are more malleable, allowing adaptations to flourish in line with prevailing societal norms. However, it is worth noting that the Catholic church has proven itself as the quintessential beacon of an unwavering set of beliefs and tenets (Taylor, B. (2018). “Catholicism: An unwavering set of beliefs”. The Observatory. [Online] Available at: www.the-observatory.org/catholicism-an-unwavering-set-of-beliefs). Throughout its time-swept chronicles, the institution has refused to buckle under contemporary pressures, rigidly embodying the platonic discipline, thereby ensuring its tenets remain an exemplar of timeless and unaltered philosophies. But that train of thought has now encountered a significant stumbling block, none other than Pope Francis himself. Ever since Pope Francis took over as the spiritual leader of the Catholic church around a decade ago, the faith's hitherto untouchable modus operandi has been upended, shaking the very foundations of its business model that withstood the test of time (Delia Gallagher. (2013). “Francis, the Pope who is shaking up the Church”. CNN. [Online] Available at: www.cnn.com/2013/12/17/world/europe/pope-francis-shaking-up-the-church) It is alarming but true, that Pope Francis has embarked on a journey to bring about a paradigm shift within the Catholic Church, raising numerous contentious questions about the long-held beliefs of the institution. As a lesbian woman who medically transitioned, my belief in the sanctity of the church's core values makes me question these changes. It seems to me that the heart and soul of the foundation of the Catholic Church are being tampered with – the very principles that defined its resilient character through centuries are suddenly being reshaped to keep pace with the changing times. But is this truly a good thing? Yet, it is not the first time when the church faced an ideological conundrum. Consider, for instance, the stance the church holds regarding divorce. The Catholic church doesn't approve divorce, aligning itself with the literal teaching of Jesus in the gospel of Matthew where he categorically states "What therefore God has joined together, let not man put asunder" (Matthew 19:6). But interestingly, the church does provide an 'escape hatch' for relationships claimed as ‘soured church contract’, justifying nullity in religious terms (Kelly, J. (2020). “Divorce and the Catholic Church”. Ignatius Press. [Online] Available at: www.ignatius.com/promotions/catholic-truth-society/divorce-and-the-catholic-church). Pope Francis's gradual bending of beliefs towards the modern consensus has certainly unsettled many believers, both within and beyond the Catholic community (Pullella, P. (2020), “Pope Francis divides Catholic Church with liberal views”. Reuters. [Online] Available at: www.reuters.com/news/pope-francis-divides-catholic-church-with-liberal-views). It felt that this very approach was what the church had avoided since its inception thousands of years ago, thus challenging the constancy of its doctrines. While the conventional Pope with a conservative philosophy would not question the age-old beliefs, Pope Francis has shown an unorthodox initiative in bringing about reforms, be it event-related, culture-centric or theology-influenced (Austen, I. (2020). "Francis, The People’s Pope and a Voice of Change". The New York Times. [Online] Available at: www.nytimes.com/francis-the-peoples-pope-and-a-voice-of-change) Despite disagreement from many quarters, this shift appears to increase inclusivity, aligning with liberal perspectives and embracing change. The question remains: Is this radical departure from tradition a curse or a blessing for the Catholic church? As the Pope continues to guide the church through tumultuous waters, only time will tell if his approach ends up corroding or reinforcing the edifice of the Catholic faith. As a lesbian who medically transitioned? I diagree with Pope Francis! Transman Regretter Not Scott Newgent

by Transman Scott Newgent Support Work Here: Donate Today Over the past few months, I have had the privilege of assisting an esteemed investigative journalist in uncovering the financial motives behind the alarming rise in childhood medical transition. As a 51-year-old woman who has personally undergone the medical transitioning process and now a transman, I bring a unique perspective to this critical discussion. Furthermore, being a mother to three children, having carried life and experiencing childbirth, has fueled my determination to address this pressing issue head-on. It has become my life's mission to halt the medicalization of gender-confused kids. It is imperative that we redirect our efforts towards providing compassionate support, guidance, and therapy to help children explore their gender identity freely, without resorting to invasive medical procedures. By focusing on mental well-being, nurturing acceptance, and promoting education, we can create an environment where these children are seen, heard, and understood. After careful analysis of the work that I have undertaken, I have reached a firm conclusion regarding the presence of three activist organizations that are significantly impeding the progress and opportunities for medically transitioning children. These organizations, which I refer to as a 'Dark Triad Terror' have been actively working against the well-being and rights of these vulnerable individuals. ACLU The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) is a non-profit organization devoted to protecting the civil liberties of every citizen. An intriguing and controversial topic is the specific focus in recent years on advocating for transgender rights, especially medically transitioning children. This paper comparatively investigates the ACLU's financial gain from 2014 to present, emphasizing their increased focus on campaigns promoting medically transitioning children and its potential impact on the organization's bottom line. Understanding the ACLU's Mission The ACLU was established to "defend and preserve the individual rights and liberties guaranteed to all people in this country by the Constitution and laws of the United States" (ACLU, 2021). However, in the past decade, the advocacy for transgender and specifically under-aged children's rights to transition medically has notably grown within the organization's campaign focus (Hettinger, 2019). 2014 to 2018: A Steep Rise From 2014 to 2018, the ACLU experienced a steady increase in its revenue. According to ProPublica (2019), the group's annual revenue, approximately $100 million in 2014, rose to $240 million in 2018. So, within these four years, the income more than doubled, with an increase particularly evident from 2016 onwards. This period it directly overlapped with the ACLU's emerging advocacy for transgender rights, including medical transitioning for children (ProPublica, 2019). Since 2019, an even more upward trend in the ACLU's revenue has been observed. With the national conversations surrounding transgender rights intensifying, the ACLU has cemented its work on this front. In 2019, the financial report indicated revenue had raised to staggering $300 million (ACLU, 2019). The Link between Advocacy and Rise in Funding While it cannot be definitively correlated, it is undoubtedly noteworthy that an intensifying focus on the rights of medically transitioning children coincides with a significant rise in revenue. Organizations like the ACLU mainly rely on donations, and their supporters may be motivated to donate when they perceive the issues addressed as urgent and personally relevant (Berry, 2019). By highlighting the challenges faced by transgender children, the ACLU appeals to empathic donors resulting in an increase in financial aid (Wallace, 2020). Schultz (2020) and rightly so accused the ACLU of commercially exploiting the transgender issue, arguing that 'woke' capitalism is in play. However, this powerful regard was buried under unicorn farts and glitter bombs. But I heard you Schultz. Overall, it is clear that the ACLU's financial status has considerably increased since 2014. It is intriguing how these financial gains coincide with their drive for advocacy of medically transitioning children. There is a clear link, and caution should be thrown to the wind. We are butchering children with a process that is experimental, dangerous, does not cure anything and causes massive health issues, resulting in making mental health worse. Throw caution to the wind I do not give a ticker toot losing friends, and you should not either.....start to #SCREAMLouder NOW! The Trevor Project The Trevor Project stands as one of the leading American non-profit organizations providing crisis intervention and suicide prevention services to lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer & questioning (LGBTQ) individuals. Recently, a growing discussion has emerged regarding The Trevor Project's increase in financial contributions, particularly about their perceived promotion of medically transitioning children. This essay aims to recognize the ideologies surrounding this issue, analyzing the possible connections and implications. The organization's financial success is apparent. The Trevor Project has reported considerable growth in donations and grants over the years, suggesting a rise in awareness and interest in its mission. For instance, the 2020 annual report registered a significant 113% increase in donations and grants compared to 2019 (The Trevor Project, 2020) [1]. This indicates a growing support base, which, arguably, has been spurred by the contentious issue of promoting medical transitions for transgender children. Before delving into the connection, it is crucial to outline what is meant by 'medically transitioning children.' This term generally refers to the use of hormones and puberty blockers in individuals under the age of 18 to change their physical appearance and develop a body that aligns with their identified gender (WebMD, n.d.) [2]. The process, while contentious, is often advocated for as a means to impact the mental well-being of trans youth positively. Many critics suggest that The Trevor Project's stance on this issue has driven a significant funding influx. The organization maintains a supportive approach towards transgender youth seeking medical transition, highlighting potential benefits like improved mental health and quality of life. They offer resources and information on gender transition in addition to their crisis hotline services (The Trevor Project, n.d.) [3]. The argument is that by promoting this potentially life-saving practice, the project fuels its financial growth. Future research examining other possible factors, such as broader social changes, will be crucial to better understanding the dynamics behind these financial trends and why, nearly five years ago, they received 1.3 million in donations and last year nearly hit 70 million! The real question is: If you were the CEO of 'The Trevor Project', you could increase revenue by 6600% by endorsing a medical procedure to cure what ails children. Would you jump in? The real real question is: Did they continue when they knew the truth about the carnage? I say yes, yes, and yes...Handcuffs are coming! And the Clincher Planned Parenthood The healthcare sector's evolution ties intrinsically with the shifting landscapes of society's acceptance, sensitivities and understanding. An area that has received much attention in recent years is gender dysphoria, particularly related to children and adolescents. I will critically evaluate how organizations like Planned Parenthood have professionally adapted to support these demographics, increasing their revenue streams. One of the significant controversies surrounding Planned Parenthood is its promotion of hormonal therapy for adolescents experiencing gender dysphoria. In recent years, Planned Parenthood has become one of the largest providers of Transgender Care in the United States, going beyond providing reproductive healthcare (Planned Parenthood, n.d.).[1]. This strategic shift in services is a response to the increasing demand for affordable transgender healthcare services. Consistent with this, revenue streams began to increase as Planned Parenthood expanded its programs promoting medical transition in children. These services are not without criticism, mainly due to ethical considerations and concerns surrounding the long-term effects on a growing child's physical and mental development (Biggs, 2019)[2]. However, as financial performance merely reflects demand, it is clear that some families are seeking such services profoundly. While many healthcare organizations like the American Academy of Pediatrics and the Endocrine Society endorse gender-affirming care for youth, the conversation around this issue in children is still charged (Rafferty, 2018; Hembree et al., 2017)[3][4]. Planned Parenthood, embracing the idea that everyone deserves high-quality, compassionate health care, has undoubtedly found an untapped market in this arena. Planned Parenthood's recent annual reports endorse this revelation. Following their offering of hormone therapies for transgender patients, they observed an increase in their revenues. The first-time mark-up year received heightened demand and increased public funding and private donations (Singh, 2020)[5]. This may be partially as a result of an increased societal awareness, acceptance of transgender people and activism promoting equal access to healthcare. The expansion of the services towards promoting medically transitioning children drew both praise and criticism. Supporters argue that Planned Parenthood has provided an essential service to a frequently discriminated community. At the same time, critics contend that significant decisions about a child's sexual identity should not be made hastily or without consideration of potential consequences (Cretella, 2017)[6]. The provision of transition-related services for children by Planned Parenthood has increased its revenue. These developments mirror societal changes, and despite the controversy, they demonstrate the demand for these services. Such an organizational shift is indicative of broader acceptance within society and the commitment of healthcare organizations to meet the demands of previously underserved individuals. Sources: Planned Parenthood (n.d.), Transgender Healthcare. https://www.plannedparenthood.org/learn/other-services/transgender-hormone-therapy Biggs, M. (Oct 2019), Tavistock's Experimentation with Puberty Blockers: Scrutinizing the Evidence. https://www.transgendertrend.com/tavistock-experiment-puberty-blockers/ Rafferty, J., et al. (2018), Ensuring Comprehensive Care and Support for Transgender and Gender-Diverse Children and Adolescents. https://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/142/4/e20182162 Hembree, W.C., et al. (2017), Endocrine Treatment of Gender-Dysphoric/Gender-Incongruent Persons: An Endocrine Society Clinical Practice Guideline. https://academic.oup.com/jcem/article/102/11/3869/4157558 Singh, J. (2020), Planned Parenthood Annual Report 2018-2019. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4648493/ Cretella, M.A. (2017), Gender Dysphoria in Children and Suppression of Debate. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4868605 The Trevor Project. (2020). Annual Report. Retrieved from https://www.thetrevorproject.org/about/annual-report/ WebMD. (n.d.). What Does It Mean to Be Transgender? Retrieved from https://www.webmd.com/sex/guide/transgender The Trevor Project. (n.d.). A Guide to Being an Ally to Transgender and Nonbinary Youth. Retrieved from https://www.thetrevorproject.org/resources/trevor-support-center/guide-to-being-an-ally-to-transgender-and-nonbinary-youth GLAAD. (2019). Accelerating Acceptance 2019. Retrieved from https://www.glaad.org/sites/default/files/Accelerating%20Acceptance%202019.pdf Atton, C. (2002). Alternative Media. London, England: Thousand Oaks. 'ACLU', American Civil Liberties Union (2021) Available at: https://www.aclu.org/issues/lgbtq-rights/transgender-rights 'The Trevor Project', The Trevor Project (2021) Available at: https://www.thetrevorproject.org/about/ 'Transgender Services', Planned Parenthood (2021) Available at: https://www.plannedparenthood.org/learn/health-and-wellness/transgender 'Gender dysphoria in youth', American Psychological Association (2020) Available at: https://www.apa.org/topics/lgbtq/gender-dysphoria 'Transgender identities', NHS (2021) Available at: https://www.nhs.uk/conditions/gender-dysphoria/ ACLU. 2019 Annual Report. Retrieved from https://www.aclu.org/other/2019-annual-report ProPublica. (2019). Nonprofit Explorer - American Civil Liberties Union Incorporated. Retrieved from https://projects.propublica.org/nonprofits/organizations/133066458 Hettinger, L. A. (2019). Interest group strategies and judicial outcomes at the US Supreme Court. American Politics Research, 47(2), 403-421. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1532673X18818176 Berry, J. M. (2019). The nonprofit sector and the policy process. The Nonprofit Sector: A Research Handbook, 582-609. Retrieved from https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/The_Nonprofit_Sector_Third_Edition/vEv8Naj29LkC?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=The+Nonprofit+Sector:+A+Research+Handbook&printsec=frontcover Schultz, E. (2020) Woke Capitalism: A Debate. Policy Review. Retrieved from https://www.thepublicdiscourse.com/2020/09/71181/

by Transman Scott Newgent Let's Talk About Facts! Pedophilia is a personal and societal issue of concern, evoking strong emotions and challenging tolerance limits to which we MUST push back, nothing evolving here. Pedophilia is WRONG always has been and always will be! Queer theory, on the other hand, serves as a lens through which we investigate, challenge, and disrupt dominant norms around sex, gender, and sexuality. The intersection of pedophilia and queer theory raises questions of morality, legality, and social acceptance, which required critical examination (1) and begs for us to #SCREAMLouder Who am I to judge? Just a lesbian who medically transitioned! The Question That Lingers: "Is 'Queer Theory' Based on The Principles of Making Pedophilia Mainstream?" Hell, YES IT DOES! Understanding Pedophilia: Defined by the American Psychiatric Association, pedophilia refers to adult sexual attraction towards prepubescent children (Istrefi, R, et al., 2018), generally below the age of 13. However, it is important to understand that not every person with pedophilic tendencies acts out on their attractions, and not all child sexual abuse is committed by individuals with pedophilia (1. Istrefi, R., et al., (2018). Pedophilia: The Disorder, Crimes and Consequences, "Psychiatria Danubina." URL: http://www.psychiatria-danubina.com/abstract/2018-1-3/#:~:text=Pedophilia). Interrogating the issue through a cultural lens, Fagan et al. (2002) indicate that pedophilia tends to be increasingly perceived as an orientation, similar to heterosexuality or homosexuality, rather than a modifiable behavior (2. Fagan, PJ, Wise, TN, Schmidt, CW, & Berlin, FS. (2002). Pedophilia. "The Journal of the American Medical Association." URL: https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/194537). The Context of Queer Theory: Queer theory, conceived in the early 1990s, is a field of critical theory that emerged from queer studies and women's studies (Edelman, L., 2004) (3. Edelman, L. (2004). No Future: Queer Theory and the Death Drive. "Duke University Press." URL: ttps://assets.ctfassets.net/4wrp2um278k7/resourceItem/5d94b3301c66c24c6547b3d0/original/edelman_no_future.pdf). It questions the fixed categories of sexual identity and challenges the societal norms around sex and gender. Pedophilia and Queer Theory: A Complicated Dance: The intersection of pedophilia and queer theory is a contentious subject. However, critical engagement with this issue does not mean endorsement; rather <---- BULLSH$% Yes it does? I'm trying to write with a less harsh lense but let's call QUEER THEORY for what it is! Perverted sexual ideology that is intended to make pedophilia more mainstream acceptable. That's truth. Conversely, Angelides (2004) turns to queer theory to investigate how pedophilia is socialized and classified. In his analysis, pedophilic desire is problematized as a gendered issue and an 'unnatural' desire in stark contrast to societal norms (5. Angelides, S. (2004). Feminism, child sexual abuse, and the erasure of child sexuality. "GLQ: A Journal of Lesbian and Gay Studies." URL: https://read.dukeupress.edu/glq/article-abstract/10/2/141/34885/Feminism-Child-Sexual-Abuse-and-the-Erasure-of). The Underpinnings of LGBTQ+ and Queer Theory: A Historical Perspective and its Consequences. Derived from an amalgam of critical theories, Queer Theory emerged in the early 1990s as a new approach to traditional studies about gender and sexuality. This radical theory demanded a shift to the way we understand and study sexuality, challenging heteronormative assumptions, while promoting an increased acceptance of the LGBTQ+ community. However, the premise upon which Queer Theory was built has become a subject of increasing controversy, with some critics proclaiming its roots in pedophilic discourse. Support Work - Donate Today The term 'queer' was brought into academic discussion by Teresa de Lauretis during a conference at the University of California in 1990 (Lauretis, 1991). Primarily, the term served as a counter-culture movement, reclaiming the previously derogatory usage of 'queer.' De Lauretis' theory was built on the works of scholars like Michel Foucault, Gayle S. Rubin, and Judith Butler, amongst others, contributing to creating a transdisciplinary space for the development of Queer Theory (Eng, Halberstam & Muñoz, 2005). TRUTH BOMB! 'Queer Theory Coined by The Pedophilia Ring Of THREE! A Pedophile A Promoter of Pedophilia A Lesbian Who Believed Pedophilia Is OK As Long as The Child Had Fun! (https://www.jstor.org/stable/30227557) Contrary to the aforementioned progress of LGBTQ+ rights and recognition, a facet of public debate links Queer Theorists to a dark side of human sexuality—pedophilia. One of the leading examples is the controversial French theorist, Michel Foucault. Renowned for his work, “The History of Sexuality,” Foucault is often critiqued for promoting intergenerational sex, stemming from his work, 'Sexual Choice, Sexual Act' (1977). (https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/15240657.2021.1932078) Moreover, Gayle Rubin's theoretical framework of a 'charmed circle' argued against defining certain sexualities, including pedophilia, as 'bad' (Rubin, 1984). Such arguments have attracted heavy criticism and sparked the notion of Queer Theory being laid on pedophilic foundations. (https://www.jstor.org/stable/3810069) The viewpoint that Queer Theory facilitates pedophilia exaggerates, particularly due to the nexus shown by the North American Man/Boy Love Association (NAMBLA), which argued that consensual intergenerational sexual relations were a form of queerness. Consequently, Queer theorists faced accusations of promoting pedophilia, despite most Queer theorists distancing themselves from the assertion (Freedman, 2003). (https://www.bu.edu/law/files/2018/09/1-1-04_Whitney_Web.pdf) Public opinion has attributed several alleged negative consequences to Queer Theory. They believe it undermines the conventional family structure, promotes 'sexually deviant' behavior, and normalizes harmful conduct like pedophilia. Which is does! <----Another Truth Bomb ---- The latter claim was amplified when critics began to interpret Queer Theory as a vehicle promoting pedophilia, leading some to argue that a clearer demarcation should be made between Queer Theory and pedophilia (Levin, 2004). (https://www.jstor.org/stable/3649132) Queer Theory’s inception and development were principally intended to work towards LGBTQ+ rights and visibility. However, it ends up in the middle of controversy due to the questionable contributions by some of its theorists. Further exploration into the realm of Queer Theory is not only required but also expected to unravel the contentious layers of this critical theoretical approach, ensuring the promotion of inclusivity and contesting harmful prejudices. It is equally crucial to NOT distinctively separate the concept of queerness from pedophilia, because they were created to promote each together and live in the filth of perversion. These are truths. 'Queer Theory' is for PERVERTS, based on promoting and desensitizing people to the acceptance of pedophilia or as the 'Queer Theorist' call in, 'child/adult sex!' Call it what you want, it's wrong and you straight parents? You need to start getting pissed off because 'The Trevor Project has 70 million a year to teach your children in school all about 'QUEER LOVE!' The truth is the truth! Are you PISSED OFF YET?

The Financial Influences in Medical Transitions of Children: An Examination of Lupron's Role, its Lawsuits and the unintended Damage caused. Support Work Donate Today Not many voices within this debate, consider a donation today. by transman Scott Newgent A conspicuous trend in recent years has been the growing number of children affirming they are transgender. For many, this self-identification leads to hormonal treatments and other medical procedures intended to transition their bodies. However, the Heck et al. study (2014) underscores the severe health outcomes that may stem from early transitioning, such as psychological distress and suicide rates among transgender individuals' post-transition ("Mental Health and Suicide Risk," https://bit.ly/2TNZCyH). This narrative essay expounds on the monetary aspects driving this trend, the lawsuits raised against Lupron and the potential damage they may induce. Leuprorelin, marketed as Lupron, a gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist, is commonly administered to children diagnosed with gender dysphoria to halt their natural puberty. While originally designed to treat prostate cancer and endometriosis, it has emerged as a linchpin in paediatric transgender healthcare (Dehesa, 2015)[1]. The financial influence in these medical transitions is significant. Owing to its patent, Lupron's high cost creates enormous profits, with a monthly dose for a child costing around £2800/$3500(Rodriguez, 2017)[2]. Given the sheer number of children undergoing such transitions, companies manufacture the drug, like AbbVie, are profiting immensely. The latest numbers from the Willams Institute have revealed a surprising statistic - over 300,000 children between the ages of 13-17 in the US alone identify as transgender and are seeking medical transition. This particular age group is usually prescribed puberty blockers, which are taken over a 3-year period of time. This is a crucial step for these young individuals to align their physical bodies with their gender identity. The total revenue at stake if the medical and mental health industry have their say the Finacial implications are mind blowing! The Total Revenue Amount at Stake Per Year: thirteen billion three hundred twenty million Suggested Medical Route 3 Yrs. at Stake: thirty-nine billion nine hundred sixty million These numbers reflect if every child who believes they are transgender was started on puberty blockers. We know that's not going to happen, but isn't that essentially the point? Feelings change, and children's feelings of who they are change at a rapid speed! If this was a consistent argument and we should medically transition all children who believe they are transgender, then these numbers would hold. Since they don't, the point is made. Being transgender is a must and not a choice for a child. It's cosmetic surgery. A plausible question emerges - are we potentially endangering children's wellbeing to line the pockets of pharmaceutical firms? Beyond profitability stands the human cost. A myriad of lawsuits has been filed against Lupron due to allegations of serious side effects (Mariani, 2017)[3]. In these proceedings, patients reported enduring brittle bones, faulty joints and cognitive impairment as a result of the drug's administration. Some families professed that their children, once lively and vigorous, were transformed into listless versions of their former selves (Ali, 2018)[4]. Lupron's adverse effects have thus become a source of multiple medical malpractice lawsuits. As profits sky-rocket, judicial contests seem to undermine the risks associated with the drug. And what of its damaging repercussions? There are alarming implications for children subjected to long-term use of puberty blockers. Studies suggest these children may suffer from skeletal health problems, infertility, impaired cognitive abilities, and even an increased risk of suicide (Kaltiala-Heino et al., 2018)[5]. Interrogation of these financial dimensions raises ethical and practical concerns about such medical transitioning for children. It calls for a thorough evaluation by healthcare professionals, legal legislators, as well as the society at large. Each child's best interest must dictate decisions made about their healthcare, not profit agendas of pharmaceutical companies. In the annals of corporate malfeasance, many have filled speech and literature, yet few resonate so profoundly as the notorious Lupron case of 2003 (US Department of Justice, 2003)[^1^]. This was a landmark instance in pharmaceutical legal history, moulding a paradigm shift in public health policy and corporate governance. It involved the sacrosanct domain of public health, challenging the very ethos behind medical practice - the Hippocratic Oath, 'primum non nocere,' first, do no harm. But Let's Not Forget Lupron's Medical Malpractice Case - 2003 US Fined 874 million and called a "Criminal Enterprise." Lupron, was the epicenter of a scandal that notably resulted in its manufacturers, TAP Pharmaceuticals, being levied with an unprecedented fine of $874 million (The Guardian, 2003)[^2^]. The US government further branded TAP Pharmaceuticals a 'criminal enterprise,' - a designation potent in its damning indictment (The Guardian, 2003)[^2^]. The scandal was catalysed by the unsettling revelation of Lupron’s overpricing and an illicit marketing scheme designed to exploit the US Medicare system (Kesselheim & Avorn, 2008)[^3^]. The venality of TAP Pharmaceuticals concocted a cesspool of malfeasance, inflating health care's cost and undermining its sanctity. To dissect this, we must delve into understanding the sordid modus operandi employed. TAP's marketing ploy involved incentivizing physicians illicitly to prescribe Lupron over cheaper, equally effective options. For every Lupron injection administered, physicians were reimbursed at a significantly higher rate by Medicare (Lichtenberg, 2005)[^4^]. This scheme, though lucrative for doctors and TAP alike, was at the expense of taxpayers and the ethical integrity of the healthcare system. The US government's response, penalizing TAP Pharmaceuticals with what was then the most massive criminal fine in the history of American healthcare, was indicative of the gravity of TAP's malpractices (US Department of Justice, 2003)[^1^]. The enormity of the fine was a determinant effort to deter other pharmaceutical corporations from mimicking TAP's malevolence. The Lupron malpractice case was an egregious violation of public trust and corporate responsibility engendering a legislative revival in distinct ways. Firstly, it foregrounded the dire need for systematic oversight, transparency, and reform in the pharmaceutical industry pricing strategy. The dire consequence was that it stirred a thorough legislative response, leading the US Congress to enact legislation aimed at preventing such unscrupulous pricing behavior (Kesselheim & Avorn, 2008)[^3^]. Finally, the Lupron case underscored the potent power of whistleblowing in uncovering corporate malpractices. The act of two intrepid salesmen - Douglas Durand and Dr. Joseph Gerstein - reporting TAP's malpractice to the authorities exemplified the paramount role informants often play in unveiling such impropriety (ABC News, 2001)[^5^]. What about 'The Social Contagion Effect' Yet, the most alarming proposition debates how this vast transgender identification expansion might derive from social contagion, a process where conformity and an empathetic urge collide (Littman, 2018, https://bit.ly/3iVjn4X). This suggests we are living in the grip of a societal craze, where transgender confession enjoys both encouragement and pervasive exposure, especially via online resources (Rauch, 2022, https://bit.ly/3zsho6w). Report Reveals Sharp Rise in Transgender Young People in the U.S. Study estimates trans youth population has doubled in 5 years. Putting numbers on the rise in children seeking gender care What’s behind the rising profile of transgender kids? 3 essential reads Study estimates trans youth population has doubled in 5 years new estimates based on C.D.C. health surveys point to a stark generational shift in the growth of the transgender population of the United States from .06% of the population to a staggering 8.4% stated by the latest polls. in 2022, there were about 25.8 million children between the ages of 12- and 17-years old living in the United States. If the newest figure of 8.4% of children believe they are transgender and in need of medical transitioning the 300,000 children jump to nearly 2.3 million children. Shall we do the new numbers? Let's do it: 300,000 children who believe they are transgender would generate: Thirty-nine billion nine hundred sixty million - Revenue up for grabs New study/Number of children who believe they are transgender 2.5 million. children who believe they are transgender would generate: Three trillion three hundred thirty billion - Revenue up for grabs These are dollars dangling in front of all though pharmaceutical executive. Now tell me again that medically transitioning children is about human rights...I dare you! Contrarily, some posit that what observers note as contagion is a diaphanous development of confidence among children, prompted to come out and express their transgender feelings in a more accepting society (Aitken et al., 2022, https://bit.ly/3oNkxDU). 'Detransitioners' While social acceptance is paramount, it's important to contemplate the potential repercussions. The existence of 'detransitioners' - those who regret their decision to medically transition - adds a level of complexity to our understanding of early transitioning ("Transgender Kids," https://bit.ly/3iX1jj1). Preventing Unwanted Scenario An in-depth approach, incorporating not only the child's desk but also considering their cognitive development, mental health, and the influence of societal trends, should be adopted when dealing with transgender identification in children. The goal of healthcare, in this case, should be to prevent harmful or unnecessary medical interventions (Marchiano, 2022, https://bit.ly/3Cyn9zw). Undoubtedly, the escalating numbers of children professing a transgender identity pose a unique challenge to society and healthcare providers. It is essential that this increase, paralleled with an understanding social contagion and accelerated by affirmation culture, is considered seriously. There must be a nuanced approach that respects and supports these children's self-proclaimed identities while cautiously acknowledging the potential life-altering outcomes of early medical transition. Support Work Donate Today Not many voices within this debate, consider a donation today. The financial aspects of medically transitioning children are layered and complex. Though Lupron seems to offer a lucrative avenue for certain companies, the benefits are outweighed by the complications ensuing from its use, both in legal and health terms. The health of our future generations should never be subjugated to the whims of financial prognoses. Sources: [1]Dehesa, R. (2015). Use of GnRH agonists in adolescents with gender dysphoria: a first update. International Journal of Transgender Health, 16 (1), 29-37. Retrieved from: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/15532739.2016.1151805 [2]Rodriguez, A. (2017). Rising costs of transgender hormones threaten self-administration. The Guardian. Retrieved from: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2017/jul/08/transgender-hormones-health-care-costs [3]Mariani, M. (2017). The controversy surrounding Lupron, a puberty-delaying drug for children. The Atlantic. Retrieved from: https://www.theatlantic.com/health/archive/2017/07/puberty-blockers/532473/ [4]Ali, A. (2018). Is there a Lupron disaster for children? Implications of the drug’s side effects. HealthImpactNews. Retrieved from: https://healthimpactnews.com/2018/is-there-a-lupron-disaster-for-children-implications-of-the-drugs-side-effects/ [5]Kaltiala-Heino, R. (2018). Two years of gender identity service for minors: overrepresentation of natal girls with severe problems in adolescent development. Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Mental Health, 12. Retrieved from: https://capmh.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13034-018-0220-6

by Transman Scott Newgent Voices within this debate are few, ensure they remain. Consider a donation. Phalloplasty, colloquially known as transman bottom surgery, represents an integral part of the transgender surgical transition. This unique surgical procedure involves creating an artificial penis, commonly nicknamed 'pseudo-penis,' using skin usually retrieved from the patient's arm. While some online platforms issue sparse advisories regarding phalloplasty, overarching medical literature and online deliberation seldom present a genuinely realistic depiction of this surgical procedure. Narrowing down specifically on complication rates, it becomes evident that empirical data reflects these are shockingly high, reaching an alarming 67% ("Phalloplasty: Risks and Complications," 2021) [1]. This essay delves into exploring the phalloplasty procedure, the corresponding complication rates, and the lack of comprehensive information available on public platforms. The advent of phalloplasty demonstrates an intricate fusion of medical and surgical advancements. Commonly procured from the forearm, the skin graft constitutes the foundational building block for constructing a functional penis. Loree et al. (2020)[2], in their medical journal, shed light on the intricate nature of the procedure, in which a successful implementation can redefine the patient's quality of life. However, juxtaposing the life-changing attributes of phalloplasty with its inherent risks paints a contrasting picture. The surgical procedure encompasses the entirety of the patient's body, wherein a divergence from expected parameters may usher in unexpected complications. Higher complication rates have been observed stemming from the multifaceted nature of the surgical procedure — ranging from healing difficulties to infections and functional limitations — evidence gathered from the University of Michigan Health System[3] paints a grim picture. A study conducted by Nikolavsky et al. (2015) [4], suggests that among the gamut of complications that may occur, urinary stricture and fistula development rank among the most common. Further corroborating the data by Nikolavsky et al., Masson-Lecomte et al. (2013)[5] in their study 'Long-term complications following phalloplasty in trans men,' provides a distressing figure: over two-thirds of patients might encounter some form of surgical complication. A striking discrepancy remains prevalent in the garb of online public discourse surrounding phalloplasty – the inadequate transparency and detailed awareness among potential recipients of the procedure. Whilst preserving the optimism related to a successful phalloplasty operation, it is crucial to temper this with the reality of possible complications. This dual approach is vital to avoid pearl-clutching shocks and equip candidates with pragmatic expectations. In conclusion, the high complication rate presents a considerable concern that must be acknowledged, conferred, and acted upon, both within the medical field and society at large. The veil of incomplete information should be lifted and supplanted with an honest, comprehensive discourse, adequately preparing individuals for the potentially life-altering decisions they may need to take. I will leave you with a more 'Scott' ending! The phalloplasty should be illegal and hiding the complications behind the idea that the phalloplasty is about love and tolerance is revolting. References: 1. Phalloplasty: Risks and Complications (2021). The American Society for Aesthetic Plastic Surgery. https://www.plasticsurgery.org/cosmetic-procedures/phalloplasty/risks-and-safety. 2. Loree, J. Mark et al. (2020). Phalloplasty surgery in the male. Current Opinion in Urology. https://journals.lww.com/co-urology/Abstract/9000/Phalloplasty_surgery_in_the_male.99232.aspx. 3. University of Michigan Health System. (2021). Phalloplasty Complications. https://www.uofmhealth.org/health-library/zb1285. 4. Nikolavsky, D. et al. (2015). Management of complications after phalloplasty. Therapeutic Advances in Urology. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/1756287215575914. 5. Masson-Lecomte, Alexander, et al. (2013). Long-term complications following phalloplasty in trans men. European Urology Supplements. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1569905613606449.

To begin, it is essential to recognize that homosexuality refers to a person's romantic or sexual attraction to individuals of the same gender. It is about an individual's innate orientation, not to be confused with gender identity. On the other hand, transgenderism refers to an individual whose gender identity differs from the sex assigned to them at birth. Gender identity is based on a want regardless of reality or truth. At least that what it has become! The threads of discourse on homosexuality and transgenderism weave a tangled tapestry, fraught with scientific uncertainties, societal conundrums, and existential queries (1. Murphy, T.F. "Our understandings of gender and health are evolving". The Conversation. 8 Jun. 2019. https://theconversation.com/our-understandings-of-gender-and-health-are-evolving-116994). Indeed, what does happen when a male body undergoes protracted exposure to estrogen? Furthermore, how do detransitioners grapple with their previous decisions? LGBT+ initiatives seldom yield precise answers, partially due to a scarcity of comprehensive research (2. Jao, N. “Lack of Knowledge About Transgender Health an ‘Epidemic,’ Study Says,” Scientific American, 24 Sep. 2019, https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/lack-of-knowledge-about-transgender-health-an-epidemic-study-says/). Sex Hormones and Adolescence: The human adolescent process typically involves the manifestation of secondary sexual characteristics guided by endogenous hormones. When a biological boy partakes in feminizing hormones and vice versa, distinctive physical transitions may be observed. The initial alterations are usually reversing—breast growth in males and increased body and facial hair in females. However, some effects such as fertility impairment could potentially be irrevocable (3. Hembree, Wanda C, et al. "Endocrine Treatment of Gender-Dysphoric/Gender-Incongruent Persons: An Endocrine Society Clinical Practice Guideline." The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, vol. 102, no. 11, 2017, https://academic.oup.com/jcem/article/102/11/3869/4157558). Therefore, the withholding of natural puberty presents a murky, uncharted domain that raises serious physiological and psychological concerns. The Detransition Conundrum: Recent inquiries into the psychological repercussions of detransition–the process of reverting one’s gender to align with their biological sex–have unveiled mixed findings. Some experience a cathartic release while others are teetering on the brink of regret and distress, compounding a glaring lack of accurate detransitioner statistics (4. Vrouenraets, L. J. J. J., Fredriks, A. M., Hannema, S. E., Cohen-Kettenis, P. T., & de Vries, M. C. (2020). Early Medical Treatment of Children and Adolescents With Gender Dysphoria: An Empirical Ethical Study. Journal of Adolescent Health, 67(3), https://www.jahonline.org/article/S1054-139X(20)30189-8/fulltext). Born Vs Made - Homosexuality Vs Transgenderism: Historically, homosexuality has been regarded as an innate characteristic, comparable to skin color or IQ, due to its genetic underpinnings. Numerous studies, such as the one conducted by Sanders et al. (2015), have provided evidence of the genetic linkage and have reinforced the notion that sexual orientation is inherent and unchangeable. It is crucial that we acknowledge and respect this understanding, treating homosexuality as a natural aspect of human diversity. On the other hand, transgenderism is a choice, as it involves the administration of hormonal treatments and surgeries. However, this perspective fails to consider the underlying psychological and biological factors that drive individuals towards gender transition. The dynamics of sex hormone intervention during the formative stages of development and the psychological effects on detransitioners remain poorly understood. Consequently, it is imperative that we approach this topic with an open mind and commitment to thorough investigation. Our society should not be defined by a myopic perception that oversimplifies the complexities of gender identity. While homosexuality is commonly seen as immutable, like physical attributes, we must recognize that the journey towards transgenderism is not merely a matter of personal choice. It encompasses a multitude of influences, including biological, psychological, and social factors. In light of this realization, I implore you to support robust scientific inquiry into the complexities surrounding both homosexuality and transgenderism. It is by expanding our understanding that we can break barriers and move toward a society that embraces diversity and upholds the dignity and rights of all. Through research, we can dispel myths, challenge stereotypes, and pave the way for a more inclusive future. The discussions around homosexuality and transgenderism demand our attention, empathy, and a commitment to scientific discovery. By acknowledging the genetic underpinnings of homosexuality and embracing the nuanced understanding of gender transition, we can foster an environment that celebrates diversity and supports the well-being of all individuals. Donate to help STOP childhood medical transition: Donate a SCREAM Today References: 1. Murphy, T.F. (2019, June 8). Our understandings of gender and health are evolving. The Conversation. https://theconversation.com/our-understandings-of-gender-and-health-are-evolving-116994. 2. Jao, N. (2019, Sept 24). Lack of Knowledge About Transgender Health an ‘Epidemic,’ Study Says. Scientific American. https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/lack-of-knowledge-about-transgender-health-an-epidemic-study-says/. 3. Hembree, W.C., et al (2017). Endocrine Treatment of Gender-Dysphoric/ Gender-Incongruent Persons: An Endocrine Society Clinical Practice Guideline. The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, 102, 3869-3903. https://academic.oup.com/jcem/article/102/11/3869/4157558. 4. Vrouenraets, L. J., Fredriks, M. A., Hannema, A. E., Cohen-Kettenis, M. P., & de Vries, A. C. (2020). Early Medical Treatment of Children and Adolescents with Gender Dysphoria: An Empirical Ethical Study. Journal of Adolescent Health, 67, 549-556. https://www.jahonline.org/article/S1054-139X(20)30189-8/fulltext. 5.Sanders, A.R., et al (2015). Genome-wide scan demonstrates significant linkage for male sexual orientation. Psychological Medicine, 45(7), 1379-1387. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25399360/.

by, Transman Scott Newgent The complexity and ambiguity surrounding medical transitioning in children and adolescents automatically incur grave considerations on how much we truly understand about the long-term consequences. This isn't a matter of personal beliefs or attitudes towards transgender individuals but rather serves as a cry for an intricate study regarding the possible long-term health consequences of engaging in hormone therapy during adolescence. This subject inversely emphasizes the importance of developing a comprehensive understanding of the matter to ensure an unnecessary risk isn't posed to young individuals who are grappling with gender incongruity. Business Insider's article indicates that today, there's a rising number of young transgender individuals seeking hormone treatments to transform physical characteristics to align with their gender identity (Business Insider, 2019) [1]. However, the premise framed is that much of the effects of treatment are uncertain given the lack of comprehensive long-term studies. One particular influence we must scrutinise is the effect of hormone replacement therapy on a biological boy or girl without experiencing natural puberty. To this date, there is no substantial literature that sketches a clear picture of what these effects might entail (Wallien, M. & Cohen-Kettenis, P. 2008) [2]. We currently know that medically transitioning children can lend to numerous health challenges. These include decreased life expectancy, premature death from heart attacks and pulmonary embolisms, bone and possible liver damage, and increased mental-health complications (Cantor, 2015) [3]. Donate to the fight to STOP childhood medical transition Today. Furthermore, an increase in mood syndrome symptoms and a 12% higher likelihood of developing symptoms of psychosis than the non-trans population have also been reported (Marshall, E., Claes, L., Bouman, W.P. 2016) [4]. The levels of hormone blockers used for the treatment could also stunt brain development. As severely unsettling as this sounds, it is even more alarming that the number of reported complications has increased to 26. These negative impacts go beyond physical health, with individuals medically transitioned hampering their lifetime sexual pleasure and enjoyment to some extent. More concerning is the continued susceptibility to mental health issues, with suicide rates in post-medical transition individuals reported significantly higher than the general population (Cantor, 2015) [3]. This raises the inevitable question; if medical transition doesn't offer a substantial improvement in mental health outcomes, should it be considered a first-line treatment in pediatric patients? Given the velocity at which gender dysphoria and medical transition are evolving, it is imperative that we invest time and resources into comprehensive research. The limited knowledge we possess highlights a strong need to comprehend this complex issue completely. Only through a profound understanding can we develop interventions that holistically support transgender adolescents. It will also help in deciding whether medical intervention should be an option. The silence about the ambiguity should not be mistaken for the absence of the problems. In the end, the discourse should not be about the gender issue itself but about finding an optimal means to support this vulnerable group in our society. Decreased life expectancy, Premature death from heart attacks, Premature death from pulmonary embolisms, Bone damage, Possible liver damage, Increased mental-health complications, Increases chances of mood-syndrome symptoms, Increased suicide rates than the non-trans population, 12% higher chance than no trans population to develop symptoms of psychosis, Brain development stunted during hormone blockers Reduced chance for lifelong sexual pleasure, Probably does not even improve mental health outcomes References [1] Business Insider. 2019. Demand for transgender medical care is exploding. https://www.businessinsider.com/demand-transgender-medical-care-is-exploding-2019-6 [2] Wallien M.S, Cohen-Kettenis P.T. 2008. Psychosexual outcome of gender-dysphoric children. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18981931/ [3] Cantor, J. 2015. Do Trans- Kids Stay Trans- When They Grow Up? https://www.sexiologist.com/data/Do%20Trans-%20Kids%20Stay%20Trans-%20When%20They%20Grow%20Up.pdf [4] Marshall, E., Claes, L., Bouman, W.P. et al. Non-suicidal self-injury and suicidality in trans people: A systematic review of the literature. https://www.sciencedirect.com/sciences/article/pii/S1158136015001348

2-07-2022 By, Scott Newgent Scott Newgent France Speech-Trans vs Trans-Game-Set Match. 'Med-Transing Is No Place For A Child' Grab My Hand Y'all - Now! Right Now! March is the month that EVERYTHING changes within the 'transing children debate" French below; English in the video version: J'ÉTAIS TELLEMENT EXCITÉ quand on m'a demandé de parler aux parents et aux enfants confus aujourd'hui ! J'ai immédiatement commencé à noter toutes les raisons pour lesquelles la transition médicale ne convient pas aux enfants, mais j'ai vite reposé mon stylo. J'ai réalisé que répéter des faits n'aide pas les gens à voir la vérité. Ce qui aide les gens à comprendre, c'est une histoire vraie criblée d'expériences réelles. J'ai eu une belle vie, un travail puissant avec tous les avantages habituels. Mais je ne suis pas ici pour partager avec vous une histoire de réussite. Je vais vous raconter l'histoire de ma vraie vie. Je vais vous raconter une histoire d'horreur. Je m'appelle Scott Newgent, et je suis un homme transgenre de 49 ans. En 2016, j'ai subi une transition médicale au cours de laquelle - j'ai enduré sept opérations chirurgicales ; j'ai souffert d'une crise cardiaque provoquée par le stress ; une embolie pulmonaire massive, 17 mois d'infection bactérienne récurrente ; une chirurgie de reconstruction du bras infructueuse, douze séries d'antibiotiques oraux et un mois d'antibiotiques IV, ont réussi à me sauver... ;. Pendant deux trajets en ambulance et un vol de sauvetage en hélicoptère, quand on m'a fait passer devant mes enfants, qui hurlaient aux ambulanciers, les suppliant, déchirant leurs chemises et les suppliant de ne pas me laisser mourir, me suppliant de ne pas les abandonner. Je n'avais pas assez de souffle pour reconnaître que je les entendais, pas assez de souffle pour leur dire : "Je ne vous quitterai JAMAIS, JAMAIS". Donate To Support The Work To STOP Childhood Medical Transition J'ai perdu ma femme, ma maison, ma voiture et tout ce pour quoi j'avais travaillé, rebondissant de salle d'urgence en salle d'urgence sans rencontrer un seul professionnel de la santé qui avait la moindre idée de la façon de me traiter, et encore moins de me guérir. Après avoir passé de longues nuits blanches, l'équipe médicale a fini par trouver par erreur 15 cm de poils à l'intérieur de mon urètre alors que la chirurgie dans cette zone avait été finalisée. J'étais dans une douleur si atroce que le sommeil ne venait que par tranches de deux heures, induites par quelques shots de vodka, qui remplissaient mon existence d'hallucinations et de fréquentes pertes de conscience. Je ne pouvais plus le tolérer. Mon corps refusait de supporter davantage de douleur, pour se réveiller inondé de mon urine et de mon sang. Maintenant, perdre sont les faits, mais voici une histoire : Vous connaissez le Dr Marci Bowers, le chirurgien transgenre de Jazz JJennings qui vient de révéler l'état lamentable de la santé des transgenres. Ce que tant de gens crient depuis des années . "La santé trans est expérimentale, ce n'est pas pour les enfants", et ainsi de suite ! Pensez-vous qu'elle éprouve de l'empathie ou de la conscience pour ce qu'elle fait depuis plus d'une décennie ? J'ai récemment enregistré un documentaire à New York sur les enfants en transition médicale. Eh bien, devinez qui a également été interviewé pour le même reportage. Vous l'avez deviné, le Dr Marci Bowers. Le Dr Bowers est une "innovatrice dans le domaine de la chirurgie de confirmation/affirmation de genre" qui travaille au San Mateo Surgery Center en Californie. Cette interview a eu lieu environ trois semaines avant la révélation du Dr Bowers : "Oui, la santé des trans est de mauvaise qualité et ce n'est pas pour les enfants". Lorsqu'on lui a demandé si les enfants en début de puberté devaient être mis sous bloqueurs, le Dr Bowers a répondu : "Je ne suis pas une fan." Lorsqu'on a demandé à Bowers si elle pensait toujours que les bloqueurs de puberté étaient une bonne idée, d'un point de vue chirurgical, elle a répondu : "C'est typique de la médecine. On zig, puis on zag, et je pense que nous avons peut-être zig un peu trop à gauche dans certains cas." Elle a ajouté : "Je pense qu'il y a eu de la naïveté de la part des endocrinologues pédiatriques qui étaient partisans du blocage précoce [de la puberté], pensant que cette magie peut se produire, que les chirurgiens peuvent faire n'importe quoi". On a demandé au Dr Bowers si elle pensait que le WPATH avait accueilli une grande variété de points de vue de médecins - y compris ceux qui s'inquiètent des risques, qui sont sceptiques à l'égard des bloqueurs de puberté, et peut-être même critiques à l'égard de certaines procédures chirurgicales ? "Il y a certainement des gens qui essaient d'exclure toute personne qui n'adhère pas absolument à la ligne du parti selon laquelle tout doit être affirmatif et qu'il n'y a pas de place pour la dissidence", a déclaré Mme Bowers. "Je pense que c'est une erreur". Car quelques jours plus tôt, le Dr Bowers enflammait les pets de licornes. "Les enfants vont se suicider ; nous devons affirmer immédiatement" - bombes à paillettes - "les bloqueurs de puberté sont sans danger", suivi par d'autres grenades à paillettes et des licornes galopant d'un nuage à l'autre. Mais tout d'un coup, "j'ai eu une révélation. Je suis pour le pardon, mais ce que vous ne savez pas, c'est que l'interview de New York York était explosive. Ça a changé ma vie, je le savais. Mais, ce que je ne savais pas, c'est que cela a également changé la vie des personnes présentes dans le studio. Peu après l'interview, j'ai reçu ce mot du producteur : "Scott, votre histoire, votre expérience et vos conseils ont tellement de force. Vous avez changé mon monde et ma perspective, et je continue à le partager avec ceux que je rencontre." Vous voyez, je suis très ouverte sur mon expérience de la transition parce que c'est la seule façon d'obtenir l'écoute des gens. On me dit que ma vulnérabilité me donne 10. Supposons que je dispose de 10 minutes de temps neutre pour parler du bon sens à quelqu'un sans être interrompu par des pets de licorne et des bombes à paillettes. Dans ce cas, personne ne part en croyant que la transition médicale des enfants est une bonne idée. Mais cette vulnérabilité, cette place que je dois occuper pour que les gens m'écoutent ? C'est dur pour moi, et je ne mentirai pas : cela me met dans tous mes états. Mais quelque chose d'autre s'est produit ce jour-là dans le studio. Je l'ai perdu. Vous voyez, je n'ai pas dit à beaucoup de gens qu'en trois ans, à cause de la vulnérabilité constante que je ressens, j'ai quitté ma maison moins de dix fois, et seulement en cas d'urgence ou pour aller faire un tour sur ma moto, pour laquelle mes enfants achètent de l'essence. Pourquoi ? L'argumentaire joyeux et léger de la "transition médicale" et sa réalité crue ne correspondent pas du tout. Les médecins et les partisans de la transition médicale ne vous préparent pas aux troubles de stress post-traumatique liés à la transition ; ils ne mentionnent même pas le syndrome de stress post-traumatique (SSPT) ni aucune des multiples épreuves telles que celles que j'ai vécues, car cela est considéré comme transphobe ! ("Ne laissez pas les faits pleuvoir sur notre pique-nique de transition médicale, ma chère !")Vous devez savoir que le nombre de patients qui souffrent de SSPT après une transition est inquiétant. Je parie que vous ne le saviez pas ! Mais c'est un fait dont vous devez être conscient. L'expérience dont j'ai parlé dans Newsweek - la promesse que j'ai faite à l'univers, à Dieu, à qui que ce soit - était réelle. C'est arrivé, et mes enfants sont liés à cette promesse. Je voulais être là pour mes enfants, et je savais que si je ne trouvais pas mon coeur, ma vie serait finie. Il y a toutes ces années, allongée sur le sol de ma salle de bain dans une douleur atroce, c'est là que j'ai trouvé mon cœur. Je ne peux refuser aucune demande qui sauvera des enfants de cette situation. Demandez à n'importe quel parent qui m'a déjà contacté pour aider quelqu'un en difficulté, et je serai là plus vite qu'un génie dans une bouteille transportée. "Vous avez sonné." Quand le coup de fil est arrivé concernant l'offre de venir à New York ? Mes enfants m'ont entendu en parler, et ils me connaissent ; ils sont au courant de ma promesse et connaissent ma personnalité. "Faites semblant jusqu'à ce que vous y arriviez, les enfants," "C'est génial. Tu as échoué, ça veut dire que tu es encore plus près de gagner si tu continues." Jusqu'à la transition médicale ? Tous ces dictons étaient ancrés en moi. Je les avais gagnés, j'étais un gagnant, je méritais ce titre. Ces dictons sont maintenant des rappels irritants de qui j'étais et de qui je me bats pour retrouver. Pour faire court, c'était la chose la plus difficile que j'aie jamais eu à faire dans ma vie, et je suis sérieux. J'ai même monté les escaliers de l'hôtel à New York en essayant d'éviter mes enfants, pour pouvoir appeler et annuler l'entretien. Ma fille était au 4ème étage dans l'escalier, sachant ce que je n'avais pas réalisé que j'allais faire. Les bras croisés, elle avait l'air d'avoir 48 ans, et j'en avais 14 ! Elle m'a pris la main et m'a sorti l'un de mes vieux dictons irritants ; elle ? Elle a roulé les yeux en disant : " Tu me dis toujours que l'anxiété, c'est être en vie, et te voilà ; félicitations, tu es en vie, papa. Maintenant, retourne-toi, tu peux le faire. Tu as fait une promesse. Qu'est-ce que ça va me dire si tu abandonnes ? "......" Aw..." J'ai agité les mains et répété la phrase infâme que je me répétais tout le temps, "C'est trop loin, j'ai compris, Gooia Gelf, je prenais juste mon manteau, je n'allais pas annuler, bon sang Julia," "Oh, alors maintenant tu as commencé à mentir à tes enfants, hein ?" On a rigolé, et elle a attendu avec moi l'uber cette fois, et je suis partie ! Ce jour-là, il y a eu bien plus qu'un nouveau déchirement de ma poitrine. C'était, comme je l'ai dit, la seule chose que je voulais fuir à tout prix, et la seule chose qui pouvait me faire aller jusqu'au bout était mes enfants. Mes enfants ont été mes parents pendant ces trois jours, me soulevant avec des phrases d'accroche, me tenant responsable avec amour. En tant que vendeur d'entreprise et présentateur toute ma vie, j'ai appris à infléchir ma voix, mon ton, ma passion, à mélanger invulnérabilité et logique pour en faire une balle molle à lancer pour aider les gens à comprendre mon message. Transmettre un sentiment est une forme d'art, et je l'ai étudié toute ma vie, en observant les visages qui changent avec chaque mot et chaque livraison, ce qui donne le succès ou l'échec. L'émotion n'est pas une zone grise ; c'est noir ou blanc. Avez-vous transmis ce que vous vouliez transmettre, les avez-vous fait ressentir, Kellie ? .... Avez-vous incité les gens à changer de position ? La chose la plus difficile à faire est de changer le point de vue des gens. La décision de choisir un produit, de passer d'un service à un autre exactement identique avec un logo différent est difficile, mais il n'est pas nécessaire de surmonter des décennies d'injustice sociale pour y parvenir. Changer de point de vue sur une question émotionnelle [qui est en réalité une propagande néo-religieuse, sectaire, illibérale, dangereuse pour notre démocratie, pour la santé de nos enfants, pour les femmes, et présentée à tort et à travers comme une question de droit civil] n'est pas facile. C'est un travail danger L'idéologie du genre est présentée comme une question de société liée au seul canal qui recueille 50 % des dons dans le monde. Le LGBTQ, c'est maintenant ? Le LGBTQ est considéré comme le cheval blanc en ce moment, il ne fait rien de mal. Mais la vérité finira par éclater. Les parents se réveillent lentement devant la folie avec laquelle les médias traitent le sujet, devant les auteurs du New York Times qui discutent des corsets mammaires et des dommages irréversibles causés au corps des jeunes femmes avec la pieuse droiture d'un corsaire chinois. Mais ce jour-là, mon cerveau s'est ralenti comme il le fait rarement, mes réactions se sont faites sans effort et mon interjection, la livraison vocale a été parfaite, chaque objection a été réduite à une tentative pathétique de surmonter quelque chose qui ne peut pas l'être. Chaque mot choisi était parfait, chaque lien émotionnel, parfait, le ton de la voix - tout était parfait, et je ne l'ai pas réalisé avant la fin. Alors que les caméras commençaient à s'éteindre, et que je savais que j'avais bien fait, que j'avais vendu l'émotion, que les gens avaient changé à jamais ce jour-là, je me suis mise à brailler. Mes mains couvraient mon visage en larmes, comme si je venais de prononcer un discours de la plus haute importance. Un discours auquel non seulement vous croyez, mais pour lequel vous êtes prêt à mourir. C'est ce que j'ai ressenti, et je n'ai pas réalisé à quel point c'était important pour moi. Les larmes qui coulaient sur mes joues n'étaient pas ce que je ressentais ; j'étais soulagé de savoir que j'avais réussi ce jour-là. Je n'avais pas réalisé que j'avais pris tout cela sur mes épaules, ces enfants, tous ces enfants, les parents, les nuits de consolation, la honte, l'embarras, le rôle que j'avais joué dans le désastre de l'idéologie trans. À ce moment-là, j'ai réalisé que je savais que je pouvais changer les gens, mais je ne savais pas si j'avais le 0phéâtre. Mais ce jour-là, je me suis prouvé à moi-même que j'avais bel et bien le cœur. Mes trois coeurs m'attendaient dans la chambre d'hôtel, incapable de quitter la pièce, sachant que je devais les voir tous les trois et je l'ai fait, les trois qui représentent tout pour moi de la même manière que vos enfants représentent tout pour vous. Alors que les caméras tournaient, je l'ai senti au fond de moi ; je savais que j'étais sur le point de perdre la tête. Je ne l'avais pas perdue depuis que tout cela était arrivé, avec très peu de larmes - ce qui ne me ressemble pas du tout. Avant tout cela, je pleurais en regardant les publicités Hallmark, mais ce jour-là, je l'ai senti remonter, et le lien que j'avais avec le fait de surmonter les objections ; la technique était sans effort, mais à la fin de l'interview, j'ai regardé la salle, et un sentiment de victoire m'a envahi. Chaque objection a été vaincue sans effort. Ce jour-là, je n'ai laissé à personne d'autre la possibilité de comprendre que ce que nous faisons aux enfants est très mauvais, et que chacun d'entre nous a l'obligation d'y remédier. Lorsque j'ai levé la tête, j'ai croisé tous les regards sur moi, et ils avaient tous l'air honteux, presque gênés de la nonchalance avec laquelle j'abordais la transition médicale des enfants. Prendre la solution de facilité et ne pas déranger le tout-puissant LGBTQ. Tout le monde dans la salle avait l'air honteux, gêné de ne pas être assez courageux pour les autres, pour les enfants. Ils savaient qu'ils étaient en train de flotter dans la vie à leur manière paresseuse et non engagée. Ils savaient que ne pas remuer le couteau dans la plaie était une erreur, et ils ont tous réalisé que c'était une erreur. Mais ils savaient que j'avais remué la marmite, rendant ainsi leurs eaux traîtresses. "Tu devrais avoir honte." J'ai pensé. Toujours en sanglots, j'ai regardé chaque personne, j'ai dit leur nom et j'ai pointé du doigt chacune d'entre elles, leur faisant honte de laisser la parodie de transition médicale se poursuivre parce qu'il était difficile de s'impliquer, "Brian, tu es journaliste, honte à toi de ne pas crier !" "Sara, es-tu une productrice ? Honte à toi, tu as un enfant, double honte à toi en tant que mère de ne pas CRIER". Chaque cri, chaque conversation ou chaque repli que vous avez émis dans le cadre du débat sur la transition médicale est un grain de sable, trop pour un petit nombre, mais rien pour une armée. J'implore chacun d'entre vous d'aller sur mon site et de voir pourquoi mon émotion et mon dévouement pour arrêter la médicalisation des enfants est une passion désespérée qui ne relâchera son emprise sur moi que lorsque chaque enfant dans le monde sera en sécurité, car pour l'instant, les enfants sont en grand danger et ne le sont pas. Allez sur le site, prenez les dix minutes nécessaires pour comprendre ce qui, selon cette dangereuse idéologie, passe pour de l'amour des enfants. La non-acceptation de leur corps parfait et sain. Après tout, nous parlons d'enfants. Une fois que vous aurez compris, une fois que vous aurez lu mon site ? Faites ce qu'il faut, CRIEZ pour mettre fin à la médicalisation des enfants et restez dans la ligne des "bigots" pour aujourd'hui, mais je vous assure que d'ici peu, cette ligne passera de la "ligne des bigots" à la "ligne des héros". ....La transition médicale n'est pas un endroit pour un enfant.

A speech by transman Scott Newgent Donate To Work: My name is Scott Newgent. I am a lesbian and I decided to become a transman. Despite having altered my body surgically and with hormones to look like a man, I am a woman. Only women can bear children, and I was blessed to carry life and have three beautiful children. So I know quite a bit about kids and transgender treatments. I want to end the idea that medically transitioning children and drag shows are about human rights. They're not. It's about money. It's about sexualizing children. It's about paedophilia. It's about queer theory - breaking all boundaries of normalcy and child safeguarding. So how did we get right here, right now? Rainbow vs Rainbow? The human rights want and desires of all, whether straight or gay, is the right to love another consenting adult and to be respected and protected under the laws of every country. These are righteous rights, and we had many righteous gays and lesbians fighting for these rights. Stonewall was founded in 1989 with these rights in the future view, not had, yet worth everything to us gays and lesbians, and the fight was righteous, and the warriors within this fight were righteous. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- In 2002 Adoption rights for same-sex couples - won! This was a righteous right! In 2003 Employment equality - won! This was a righteous right! 2013 Marriage Act - for gays & lesbians This was a righteous right! ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- The rights of human dignity to love whom we loved, to be recognized in the eyes of the law, protected with dignity within this great land in Britain & abroad…WON We WON….& This is where we faltered….This is where my community, the gays and lesbians, fell. You see, we won, and the righteous fighters, the righteous gays and lesbians fighting for the right to love whom we loved, to visit and be entitled to our partners in sickness, in life achievement & death. The dignity of protection within this great land and the laws…WON! We won for lesbians and gays like Janice Langbehn, a lesbian denied the right to visit her same-sex partner in the intensive care unit at Jackson Memorial Hospital in Miami, Florida. Her partner, Lisa Pond, suffered an aneurysm. At the hospital, nurses and doctors refused to let Langbehn or her children see Pond, and they did not provide them with any updates. Pond slipped into a coma while her life partner and their children cried to be at her bedside, denied, and outside the room, outside was the echoes of calling Pond's weeping family never heard by Pond. Pond died alone. These were the righteous fights….For Pond and all others to die with dignity, surrounded by the love of family, without question. Without question. The righteous fights were WON And so the beginning of a new activism business model, had by the STONEWALLS & LGBTQ+ of the world's & this is where our children were sold down the river, exchanged for the NEW activism business model, a successful new profitable model elevated and began to be maintained by skipping on the heads of odd fitting; children are most vulnerable, used….Our plight to protect future same-sex attracted children highlighted for a profitable business model of transgender medicine, included into the mix were all odd fitting children, the autistic, mentally gifted, mentally ill, abused, served on a platter to the donation gods as the new "righteous right" twisted with an evil filled ending to a righteous…bottom line. And STONEWALL…..lived on after moral, righteous rights were won. You see, in Story Time Drag show, medically transitioning children was the side step to evolve & continue an org, an activism fight that was won yet lived on, but not without strategic evil thought. In 2015 Stonewall filed for bankruptcy but never pointed to fruition. In 2015 the battle was won, the donations dried up, and a righteous organization lost funding, dwindling into the excellent night ….One final curtain call and standing ovation lead to BANKRUPTCY ….But before the last curtain call or bid into the Goodnight, a glimmer of hope & this glimmer of hope not only revised but injected radical success. STONEWALL from bankruptcy, yet 12 months later, reported a 32% year-over-year growth. A tagline of this success would have sparked an investigation for any government-funded organization in the US…whether the funding received was five government-funded dollars to 1 million. This staggering year over year would have sparked a question and jumped started a USA investigation. What happened from 2015 to 2016 within STONEWALL? STONEWALL signed to promote Mermaids and the medicalization of children! Activism is a business; being a business sales executive was lost to me as I entered activism five years ago. My plight was as a mother—a woman who had given birth, carried life, an obligation of righting a wrong. You see, Story Time Drag show, medically transitioning children was the head on which stepped to evolve & continue an organization that won! STONEWALL WON & selling children's health… Let me explain. I will start with the money. Each child who is transitioned is worth more than 1 million dollars at a minimum. It begins with the psychosocial intervention of social transition in which all the adults affirm the kids' delusion that the child can change sex. This is cruel. Because it is telling the child that everything - absolutely everything - is wrong with the child's body. They were born wrong. It moves to puberty blockers - the same drugs used to castrate sex offenders chemically. Drugs that have a long list of known severe long-term effects - such as permanent loss of bone density, brain development issues, risk of blindness, underdeveloped genitalia, and cardiovascular issues - to name a few and a whole host of unknown risks. There are over 10,000 complaints lodged against the manufacturer of the puberty blocker Lupron. It is funny how Kaiser reported on the harms of puberty blockers for precocious puberty but then promoted it for gender-confused children, as if the known horrible side effects won't affect gender-confused kids. An 18-year-old died during a vaginoplasty because puberty blockers resulted in his penis being too small to flip it inside out to make a cavity. A piece of his colon was needed for the surgery. The result was necro-titis. Males on puberty blockers at young ages and then cross-sex hormones - and about 95% continue on - will never experience an orgasm and be sterile. Another effect of estrogen on males is that it keeps their appearance looking young, with high voices, soft skin and tiny genitals. Remember what I said about paedophilia? Step 3 in the Mengele-style (Men - Ge- Lay - For Your information - a nazi doctor that performed horrible experiments on Jewish kids) treatments are cross-sex hormones. Estrogen and testosterone are being handed out like candy. With no - zero - studies that these drugs resolve gender dysphoria, alleviate companion mental health issues or prevent suicide. Suicide increases POST TRANSITION. Post-transition, transgender people are 19 times more likely to commit suicide. In a National Institute of Health study published a couple of months ago, 2 of the 315 kids took their lives within one year of starting hormones - more than 50 times the national average. The best gender doctors who were purportedly treating these kids were screened for severe mental health issues and in affirming families. Online sellers of these drugs are darlings of private investors. These groups are partnering with community kid's groups to peddle to kids. These drugs ultimately result in sterility - in as little as four months for males and within five years for women. But don't worry - these hormone sellers have partnered with fertility groups who - for a price - will try to get their sterile kids a baby later. They create the problem and then solve it as long as you can pay. Long-term cross-sex hormones cause heart issues, joint pain and increase cancer risks - hell, girls as young as 17 get fatal liver cancer from testosterone. Does this sound life-saving to you? Listen to the detransitioners - even when they stop the hormones, their physical body continues to atrophy and suffer from the effects of the drugs. They have pain that no doctor knows how to treat. Because this is a giant experiment on Kids. Kids who are developmentally unable to comprehend the risks or what they are giving up. Now for the surgeries. Vaginoplasty - I already talked about one of the risks to a healthy boy - death. Now let's get gross - shall we? Hair growing in the cavity, odor of bowels, sleeping with a wound expander inserted to prevent the hole from closing. Remember we are doing this to healthy bodies and minors in the name of authentic self. Males are having their gonads removed. WPATH and its President, Marci Bowers promotes eunuchs as a gender for children. It shouldn't be allowed for adults. It's insane. For the females, it's breast removal - let's not call it top surgery and make it sounds like a no-big-deal. It is - it is enormous. Besides the complications which occur In the majority of the surgeries, there are no takebacks. Once the breasts are gone, they are gone forever. So is the ability to breastfeed a child. The holy grail of surgeries, and the most expensive and least successful, is phalloplasty. Look at my arm - this is a deformity I show the world almost daily to get something that resembles a penis that is hidden in my pants. Some women carved up their thighs to get a facsimile of a penis that carries a substantial risk of severe complications and long-term effects. The surgeries are a growing market that is so lucrative that it is tracked so people can invest in it. In the US, surgeries were worth $1.9 Billion in 2021 and is expected to grow at a compounded rate of 11.23% annually. This is better than most stock and bond returns. No wonder there are more than 400 pediatric gender centres in the US now when 10 years ago, there were just a handful. Again to interject the human rights angle again, Stonewall moved from being a gay rights group rewriting its history to becoming the UK's most prominent influencer in pushing children and young adults to reject their bodies, monetizing itself by rewarding corporations to deny biological reality. How Stonewall superglued the T to the LGB, erasing the LGB on the way. Stonewall was founded in 1989 for a very laudable purpose - to win equal treatment under the law regardless of who one loves. Many righteous gays and lesbians fought for these fundamental human rights. The gay and lesbian community's human rights were won. Instead of celebrating and going about our lives, which is what we wanted - we wanted to live freely, raise families, have lasting partnerships, and be able to nurse our partners. Instead of just living and disbanding all of the charities that reached the righteous goals, charities like Stonewall had grown so big that they needed to move the goalpost - they needed a new battle to wage. There was money at stake; the machine needed to be fed. The charities forgot the the golden rule that charities' ultimate goal is to go out of business because they achieved their objective. And so began a new activism business model based in queer theory - where everything that was accepted as normal must be turned upside down. This is when Stonewall and other activist groups targeted the gay community itself, like me - convincing me that I was not a lesbian but a man trapped in a woman's body - and more sinisterly, the LGBTQ groups turned to the children. Yes, these alleged human rights groups are here to take the children from loving parents, remove their innocence, rob them of their bodies, erase biology and trick gay and lesbians kids into transitioning. The righteous groups turned into predatory groups. With the gay rights goals having been met, the funding for Stonewall dried up. In 2015, it was facing bankruptcy. But Stonewall wanted to live on, so it pivoted and signed on to promote Mermaids. Mermaids is a charity that advocates for the gender transition of children. Mermaids is currently under investigation for child safeguarding failures. Susie Greene stepped down as CEO of 6 years, a woman who transitioned her son because her husband id not want a gay son - That's what Iran - the most homophobic country does. Stonewall sold out its gay and lesbian members. Instead of protecting gay and lesbian kids, its need to stay financed tarnishes its name. By the way, Greene contributed to the so-called standards of care for WPATH. This homophobic mother, who profited from kids, with no medical background had an actual say. WPATH despite its name, is just another Frankenstein Organization. Children are the new revenue stream. They are also being used as cover for depraved and fetish behavior. It goes like this - if they can normalize the transgenderism of children - they can claim being trans is natural, immutable and normal. It is none of these things. This new agenda will open access to children, sex positivity, and normalizing the sexualization of children. This is where Drag Show Story Time comes in. Men with garish makeup, scantily dressed, simulating sex moves in front of children. Having young children listen to books being read aloud designed to confuse children about their bodies, normalize sexual language, and desensitize them to adult behaviour is grooming. First, it was reading books to kids, but that was not queer enough so it moved to perform sexual drag shows for kids at libraries and schools, but that was not boundary-breaking enough - now it's let's teach the young boys and girls to spackle on makeup, wear barely-there clothing and dance for the US - the adults - for money. Yes, let's have them split their legs apart, shake their bottoms, and shimmy their chests, while we place money in their clothes. Donate TODAY But that is not queer enough, let's remove all safeguards about sex with children - as the United Nations just stated in March. So long as the child consents, sex with them is fine. So, I ask you - is this transgender movement about human rights? No - It's about pedophilic's rights, fetish's rights and depravity. It's about robbing children of their innocence and profiting from their bodies. Every lesbian and gay man, parent and grandparent, woman and man should be standing up and saying no. Keep your hands of the children and vulnerable adults who are being used to feed the machine. NO ONE HAS THE RIGHT TO HARM A CHILD - NOT THE PARENTS, NOT THE DOCTORS, NOT THE TEACHERS, NOT THE GOVERNMENT. _____________________________________________________ UN STATEMEN - QUOTE "With respect to the enforcement of criminal law, any prescribed minimum age of consent to sex must be applied in a non-discriminatory manner. Enforcement may not be linked to the sex/gender of participants or age of consent to marriage. Moreover, sexual conduct involving persons below the domestically prescribed minimum age of consent to sex may be consensual in fact, if not in law. In this context, the enforcement of criminal law should reflect the rights and capacity of persons under 18 years of age to make decisions about engaging in consensual sexual conduct and their right to be heard in matters concerning them. Pursuant to their evolving capacities and progressive autonomy, persons under 18 years of age should participate in decisions affecting them, with due regard to their age, maturity and best interests, and with specific attention to non-discrimination guarantees. CITATION - THE 8 MARCH PRINCIPLES FOR A HUMAN RIGHTS-BASED APPROACH TO CRIMINAL LAW PROSCRIBING CONDUCT

Rogan's "fact" has gone "round the world while truth is pulling its boots on.” ÍRIS ERLINGSDÓTTIR NOV 10, 2023 I'm just going to throw this out there! ROGAN! Have Transman Scott Newgent on your show; Walsh was kind; Newgent would have eaten you alive! Not that anyone’s been waiting with bated breath for my promised Sloppy Joe Rogan post, but I still want to apologize for how late it is. [My recent R rotator cuff surgery recovery is just as nasty, brutish, and long as the surgeon promised.] Anyway, to recap, I’d been discussing with a close family member why I believed gender ideology was the greatest evil of our time: “I care about the truth, and this is all a lie.” I listed a few of the real-life effects on women of transforming preposterous ideas into policy and law – housing males with court-onset “gender dysphoria” in women’s prisons; disregarding basic safeguarding principles; destroying women and girls’ sports; depriving them of scholarships, financial opportunities, and awards – on the children and young people destroying their healthy bodies, and that brought the subject to puberty blockers. “Matt Walsh said on Joe Rogan that ‘millions’ of kids had been put on puberty blockers,” he said. ”That’s a lie. The number was not even 5,000! Walsh is a liar, a LIAR.” I knew 5,000 made no sense and promised I’d do my own research. Daily Wire show host and producer of the “What is a Woman?” documentary Matt Walsh was interviewed on Rogan’s podcast in November last year. As widely reported (a search of “Walsh & Rogan” shows pages listing rabid gender ideologues’ rejoicing quotes over how “Rogan proved Walsh a liar” (thus themselves proving that a “lie will go ‘round the world while truth is pulling its boots on”), “the pair sat down to have an in-depth discussion on gender and society. Walsh began the conversation by explaining the financial benefit healthcare providers could be getting by taking advantage of demands for gender affirming care. “…they have staked everything on this [including] their professional reputation… Not only is it the political incentive and the money, but if they admit that they’re wrong, they’re also admitting that they have horribly disfigured and abused thousands, maybe millions of kids,” he said. “How many people have had this done?” Rogan asked. [“This”, as in “gender affirming care,” which includes puberty blockers, hormones, and surgeries.] “… I don’t think we have exact numbers, but if we’re talking about the drugs, it’s…millions,” Walsh replied in reference to the medications used in the treatment of “gender dysphoria,” or “feelings cancer,” as the great Exulansic sometimes puts it. “I’m sure someone’s gonna fact check me on it, but my guess is that…we’re into the millions now at this point,” Walsh replied. “[Walsh] used the increase in mastectomy surgeries as his reasoning behind the number. “I read a report recently that there were over a thousand done between 2016 and 2019. And when you compare that to how many were done between…2008 and 2015, it is a massive increase. Over a thousand girls had double mastectomies — gender affirming double mastectomies in that timeframe,” Walsh explained. [A 2023 JAMA study found that “gender affirming surgery breast and chest procedures… occurred in almost 30,000 patients from 2016 to 2020.] As the conversation continued, the projection screen in front of Rogan and Walsh lit up and producer Jamie Vernon interjected with a fact check from a Reuters article. [The following is what Rogan’s producer got from the article:] “Over the last five years, there were at least 4,780 adolescents who started on puberty blockers and had a prior gender dysphoria diagnosis.” “That would be a big undercount,” Rogan said as he was reading the article aloud. “Less than a thousand people a year,” Vernon reiterated. “I would guess you know, hundreds of thousands at this — but I could be wrong,” Walsh corrected his earlier estimation. “A million sounds great,” Rogan laughed. “Media matters will have fun with that clip,” Walsh added. Walsh went on to blame the numbers themselves, saying that data on gender affirming care and other treatments are hard to find and trust [he is correct]. “Part of the problem though is that it’s very hard to get numbers on any of this stuff and — to know who are you gonna trust when they’re telling you the numbers…that’s one of the issues,” Walsh concluded. [Had Rogan and his producer read just a few paragraphs further, they’d have come across more information relevant – a big understatement, to paraphrase Rogan – to their discussion:] “At least 14,726 minors started hormone treatment with a prior gender dysphoria diagnosis from 2017 through 2021…However, these numbers only include children whose medical records specify a gender dysphoria diagnosis or whose treatment is covered by insurance. There are more than 100 specialized pediatric gender clinics across the U.S. “More than 300 clinics and medical offices in the U.S. … provide ‘hormonal interventions’ to minors,” and most of the nearly 600 Planned Parenthood centers dispense cross-sex hormones. In 2016, only 32 PP clinics provided “transgender care.” [emphases above are mine]. So, the correct number available to Rogan and his producer – in the story they themselves pulled up! – was almost 20,000 kids. Again, the number is limited – only pediatric patients (under 21) with a gender dysphoria diagnosis. No “kids” over 21, no privately paid prescriptions. The numbers almost certainly don’t include kids who receive prescriptions from Planned Parenthood (“one of the country’s largest prescribers of “gender-affirming” hormones. More than 35,000 patients received gender-affirming hormones from Planned Parenthood in 2021 alone, according to an NPR report”), and the Planned Parenthood numbers show that not only is it, as Walsh said, very hard to get reliable numbers on “gender affirming care,” it’s impossible. In PP’s annual report “transgender services” are listed under “Other Procedures” along with “WIC services…pediatric care…other adult preventive care, and high complexity visits, including infertility services.” In 2021, the number of “Other Procedures” was 15,902. In 2022, the number of “Other Procedures” was 256,550. The numbers make no sense. If more than 35,000 patients received hormones from PP in 2021, that should have been reflected in the number of “Other Procedures” in 2021. In any case, it would be interesting to know what specifically caused the more than 240,000 hike in “Other Procedures” at PP between 2021 and 2022. The only medical fad these days is “transgender medicine” (the oxymoronic nature of “trans/gender” ideology language must be a linguist’s nightmare). The 2023 JAMA study referred to above found that almost 50,000 “Gender Affirming Surgeries” (GAS) were performed from 2016 to 2020. What numbers on “gender affirming care” – puberty blockers, hormones, and GAS – were available a year ago is anyone’s guess, but Rogan should know better than to offer a random number from a file of Dr. Google as fact. The very least he could have done was have his staff read through it first. Rogan is usually a thoughtful, respectful conversationalist, but to say he dropped the ball here is an understatement. Serious, reality-based research and information** on “gender medicine” rarely makes the news – precisely because of those qualities – but a salacious soundbite, however erroneous, will if it fits the transtech-industrial mass media’s fictional trans narrative. So, have millions of kids have received “gender-affirming care”? Possibly. Hundreds of thousands, certainly. Thousands? Absolutely no way, and Rogan should correct that fact-free “big undercount” he offered to his 11 million listeners. In closing… Re the OB-GYN Services of Drs Transenstein & Frankenstein It’s insulting that the 2023 JAMA 2016–2020 study of these taxpayer- and health insurance premium-funded cosmetic psychosurgeries was done under the category “Obstetrics and Gynecology.” National Estimates of Gender-Affirming Surgery in the US “Results: A total of 48 ,019 patients who underwent Gender Affirming Surgery (GAS) procedures were identified…The most common procedures were breast and chest procedures, which occurred in 27,187 patients, followed by genital reconstruction in 16 ,872, and facial and cosmetic procedures 6,669.” “A total of 48, 019 patients who underwent GAS were identified (Table 1). 25 ,099 patients (52.3%) were aged 19 to 30 years 10 ,476 patients (21.8%) were aged 31 to 40 years 3,678 patients ( 7.7%) were aged 12 to 18 years [Reflect on this for a few moments: Doctors – society’s most highly educated individuals, who have been entrusted by the state with the power over people’s lives and health – are sterilizing and mutilating the healthy sexual organs of 12-year-olds.] “Almost 30,000 patients were under age 30. This study has limitations. First, there may be under-capture of both transgender individuals and GAS procedures…performed in other settings; thus, our estimates may under-represent the actual number of procedures performed each year in the US.” Your Dollar$ at Work “Private insurance coverage was most common in 29,064 patients (60.5%), while 12,127 (25.3%) were Medicaid recipients.” Flyoverland [Less InsaneLand] – TRAlifornia [InsanityLand] “Most patients (42,467 [88.4%]) were treated at urban, [sic] teaching hospitals, and there was a disproportionate number of patients in the West (22,037 [45.9%]) and Northeast (12 ,396 [25.8%]).” *“Inside Planned Parenthood’s Gender Factory” by Abigail Shrier is a recommended read for anyone, especially parents of teenagers. “Youth as young as 16 can receive hormone prescriptions…with parental consent; 15 and younger can get birth control ‘to stop periods’ without parental knowledge. Teens 18 and older who want to medically transition can typically do so without any barriers. Planned Parenthood states that ‘in most cases your clinician will be able to prescribe hormones the same day as your first visit’ and does not require a letter from a mental health doctor to start a patient’s transition.” “In order to receive gender-affirming hormone therapy services at Planned Parenthood you must be 18 or older and able to provide consent. Patients are not required to provide an approval letter from a therapist to start hormone therapy. Most people are able to get a hormone prescription at the end of their first visit with us.” **SEGM, 4thWaveNow, Exulansic, Reality’sLastStand, Helen Joyce, Gender-hacked

First Meeting: Oh, Your Scott, Not Kellie? Ok, Come On In! A true story that will help parents understand why so many gay and lesbian children gravitate to becoming transgender. Not acknowledging the truth leads to a generation of gays and lesbians butchering bodies and minds that need not be fixed. Love and acceptance is a must, and only the prescription is required. Before I begin, I want to assert that this post is raw, real, and comes from a place of total honesty. We all have a voice inside our heads that helps us navigate through the world. Our internal voice can be denied if we are embarrassed and raised when it's correct, "I always knew I was right about, blank." We all know about this little voice, which is ours to hold tight inside within the confounds of our minds. I am sharing my inside voice with you not out of frailty but from a place of force. I cannot tell you indefinitely why kids are claiming to be transgender at a staggering rate, but I know a massive part has to do with the fact that we still do not accept gays and lesbians yet, and we need to. On the other side of this revelation lies what my community has done with the acceptance we have already garnered, throwing it to the wind and lacking the leadership to STOP the new LGBTQ+ from becoming a recruiting agency for children. We won the rights that we have with slow persistence, grace and explaining that we were not after children, just after the rights to live where we wanted, work where we wanted and love who we wanted, and have protection under the law. We WON and look at us now. We have become precisely what we promised we would never be; a recruiting agency for children infiltrating school systems worldwide. Yet, here I say we have not accepted homosexuality yet, and this is the most significant cause of the butchering of an entire generation of children, the "May I have a hamburger today and pay you next Tuesday for the year worth of free hamburgers you have already given." It is embarrassing to say these words, but I can assure you, in the gay/lesbian community, we are fighting back fiercely with organizations like mine and Gays Against Groomers! We will make it right! That said, I will share why I believe many children and adults want to change genders. My insight is not scientific, which comically mirrors the whole definition of what transgender is, right? You might be laughing. Still, as someone who has medically transitioned, my laughter is zilch regarding what we are doing to a generation of children. I can assure you nothing comical about what is currently occurring to children! A Transition Story, A True Story & Why I Believe So Many Children Are Claiming To Be Transgender! I don't believe Jesus Christ was the son of God, but that doesn't make me a version of their evil. I don't think children should be anywhere near surgery or hormones; I don't care how transgender they believe they are. I believe the LGBTQ+ community has back-handed the entire world into submission, standing by foaming at the mouth, waiting impatiently to pounce on anyone who challenges their views, delighted in doing so. But I understand the cause, the pain, and the generation after generation of misery that gays and lesbians have been put through. I believe people are born gay, but some are conditioned into same-sex attraction, and this is not right, and therapy is needed to correct it. I might have been manipulated to change my sex by a highly religious Catholic woman that could not accept her sexuality, but that doesn't mean that some people do find peace with medical transition (very few, and people would be stunned how few this number is) I have always been able to reach both sides; I was blessed with the ability to see both sides of the circumstances. But, I didn't comprehend that inside an organization, a belief, a person you hate is common ground and someone exquisite, frightened and with something invaluable to say. I only understood the earnestness of this once I transitioned. Lesbian Devil to Straight Man Saint They wanted to do an intervention on a woman that finally understood why she never felt the love she saw her friends experience. Until me, she went through the motions with her husband, despising her life and feeling apathetic, only to come alive with that first sip of wine. She laughed and giggled and seemed like the most festive person, but she was tragic once you knew her. Such a depressed person, a woman that looked like the sunshine of light, was the darkest human being I had ever met. I listened to her phone calls with her family spewing hate, imploring her to be cleansed and get rid of her demons, exploiting her with the thought of spending an eternity in hell for loving me. I can say that I loathed those people, Lynette's people, with every fibre of my being. I knew they comprehended the suffering they were causing her and didn't care. Convinced, they only wanted the flawlessly straight, elegant Catholic woman to return to a husband she didn't love, never loved; they didn't care that she was distressed; they didn't care that she couldn't breathe without me. They cared only about getting her back into a box that made them feel comfortable. I medically transitioned to take that all away for her, or I have always believed this was the only explanation. Reflection and time have revealed to me that Lynette? Lynette was a catalyst; sure, I would never have medically transitioned if we had never met, but the raw reasoning why? It would have simmered, never allowing me to find peace. This experience has brought me a peace I would never have achieved without all the misery. A new revelation, and I can tell my soul is healing. As bizarre as it may sound, I am appreciative of this adventure with all the anguish, pain and tears it resurrected! I never met Lynette's family as a woman; they had seen pictures but never shook Kellie's hand, the lesbian devil. No, no, I met them for the first time as Scott, the straight man saint, swerving Lynette from reciprocating her sinful past with the lesbian devil, Kellie. As you can imagine, the first handshake, the first eyes that met mine, her entire family comprised eight brothers and one sister, a 93-year-old mother, nieces, nephew and spouses, all in a tiny home in the middle of the scorching heat of little ole, Bryan, Texas. I have dedicated my life to STOP childhood medical transition, travelling from state to state, country to country, by the grace and kindness of donations. I do not get paid for interviews or my posts for me. This is a soul mission. Thank you for helping. -Scott - Donate Terrified, Lynette opened the door with me standing behind, scared of my voice, "is it deep enough yet? Will they know that I'm Kellie, and they all HATE me?" Over and over in my head were the conversations Lynette had while we lived in our apartment together years prior when she left her husband; the phone was relentless, one call after another reminding Lynette of her sinful life, where it would lead her and how she needed to run from me with all her power. Yet, when the calls ended? I was the one she flew to; I was the one she loved and could not let go of. Everything her childhood had guided her, all the hours in church, all the lessons, and warnings could not stop her from falling in love with me and me with her! At fifty, Lynette reminded me of a child, torn down to the nubs, unable to protect herself, she was being beaten down, and it was obvious to anyone looking. Unfortunately, I was the only one who was looking at Lynette. On the drive over to Bryan, I heard Lynette giggling, changing the stations, tormenting me with her 80's music, delighting in my cringing, and I played along, but inside? All I was pondering was meeting her family, the family I knew I would hate. How would I navigate our lives within the inlaws I loathed? I had no other option; hate was the only emotion my mind went to, nothing else, no other choice; I would hate them all! The hours of conversation I heard, over and over in my head, the torment and pain in Lynette's face, watching as she was pulled apart years prior by every family member waiting to meet me as a saint, savior to Lynette, saving her from the lesbian devil! Hate, I would hate them ALL! But something happened. It wasn't long before I fell in love with everyone in Lynette's family. The care, humor, the love they had for each other, the respect they had for me, the time they invested in each other, no one yelled, hit each other or talked ill of the other; they navigated life as a family, something I had never seen in my 42 years. It was beautiful. Lynette's mother was 93 and remained in her home as any good Italian Catholic family would. Every child had a designated time to be with their mother, spending the night, helping Mawma in and out of bed, making her meals, and doing it with her standards, or they were corrected instantly. She was stern and always did what was expected, someone you could count on, and I loved her. Her children grew weary of the constant re-aligning even though they were in their 50s, 60s, 70s; she would not have anyone out of line! "Now, pull that curtain in, Lynette; that is wrong. Do as I said!" When one sibling could not make their night to care for their mom, I always raised my hand; "I will watch Mawma." I think they all thought I was crazy. What I saw in their mother was a woman who did everything as she was told because it was what she believed was right; the stern overtone was not to demean her children; she did it because she loved them. Mawma gave her everything to her family, she loved her children, and I could see it in a way they could not because I came from a childhood filled with abuse. Mawma to me? She was everything I prayed for as a child; I got my wish, I was just in my 40s and no longer a child, but it still felt like a head nod from God, a gift. "Scott, what are you doing?" I'm getting on this side of the bed; tell me more about your husband, Mawma. "Oh, all right?" Mawma would continue “You love my daughter, don't you, Scott?" I reply "Yes, very much." "Do you talk with Lynette like this, care for her this way?" I replied, "Yes, I do!" What did I see in Mawma? She was a true mother, and I was blessed to know her. The day my daughter read on the internet, she died; I instantly wept, unable to stop, and my daughter as well. May you rest in peace, Mawma; we loved you! My far reach to see both sides became vastly wider with this experience. People I knew I would hate turned into love almost instantly. I loved each one of them, and I still do. I watched them with their children, and I learned about their lives and struggles and their belief system; I began to understand why they felt the way they did. The experiences they had mixed in with the blessing of being born normal became who they were. They couldn't comprehend what Lynette was feeling; how could they ?I loved them, and I still do, and I miss them, but I went from Lesbian Devil to Straight Man Saint to just something they laugh at while eating dinner, the weirdo transgender person. I remember the night like it just happened. I remember the air, the desperation. I wanted to save her from what she went through the years before when she was trying to break free from her former life's hold on her. I wanted to save her from her soon-to-be ex-husband's phone calls that lasted for hours and hours, pounding and pounding her with terror about how it would feel on her flesh when Satan burned her into a never-ending pit of fire. I wanted to save her from looking at me and being so in love but conflicted with the voices in her head. I never in my life experienced someone told over and over repeatedly that he was not loved like a wife should love a husband and that she loved another and wanted another. Still, he refused to let go, even though he knew it would cause her pain. Mark did not care. It was cruel. Some in her family thought of it as a devoted Catholic man, but from the inside looking out, it was self-indulgent and hurtful, he was breaking her down, and he knew it. He didn't care; he wanted her back; she filled a locality in his life that gave him pleasure. He refused to succumb, and he was prepared to do what it took, even if the cost was splitting her limb from limb. He would do what he had to do to get what he wanted, so the brutal device to pull her limbs off was strapped down and administered, and once the pulling began, it didn't take long for him to succeed. With the help of her family spewing words and creating an image of her flesh burning in a fiery pit of hell, it was useless; she could not resist. Lynette would start conversations with her husband on the phone, standing, shoulders back, and ready to take on the challenge. Within 15 minutes, her body would shrink into a ball in the corner of a room, and the self-sufficient woman echoed like a child browbeaten; it was awful to watch. The dynamic was as if I watched a child scolded by her Dad. Lynette didn't speak; she just listened, nodded, and agreed with submissive shrieks of recognition. Lynette couldn't even discuss it; she just winced and endured the storm until Mark felt his position made and opinion received as the only truth. It was a strange relationship with her ex-husband; it wasn't normal; it matched the movie "The Truman Show." All the streets were decorated, the clothes ironed, but something was missing, and Truman knew that just as Lynette did. Lynette had doubted her ex-husband's sexuality before they married but threw it aside. He fit; he fit all the things to look for in a man. They were not in love, and they had never been, and you don't desire what you never knew you had. So, the years went on, and Lynette recommenced to question his sexuality and found his characteristics off but never stirred because to discover someone on an intimate level, you must have the ability to be intimate. Affection was absent, always was with their marriage. Before I first left Lynette, before my transition, when I was still Kellie, something hit me like a ton of bricks. You see, I had endured the numerous conversations with Lynette, by her side, listening to Mark's phone calls and her family, and I felt as battered as she did. But our love was beyond what I had ever experienced. Most would have left much earlier, but neither one of us could part. This morning, Lynette leaned over and rested her head on my chest and glanced into my eyes. I noticed how calm and at peace she was, embracing me. Her eyes, her brown eyes, I have never understood how an uncomplicated color like brown could make eyes dance as she could with hers. As her breathing began to rhythm, in sleep is when it hit me. She can't do it These words traversed my eyes, and I shook out of bed. It was at that moment that I knew that I had to leave. I knew at that moment Lynette would not be able to live a genuine life with me; she didn't have it in her, and her husband and family were NEVER going to let her live in peace. Staying with her was not the right thing to do for her, me, or her husband, for that matter. I did my best and left the apartment. I tried to remain solid, but the texts from Lynette with pictures of hearts or her intoxicating body would lure me to her bed. As she was packing to go back to her husband, she was seducing me; while going to marriage classes at night, she was making love to me during the day. At this time, I lost it; I couldn't take the lies, the deceit; everything was too much. I have never understood how Lynette could lie to everyone, and it never got to her; for me, it was something that broke me. I packed my family and moved 1000 miles away. I wanted Lynette; Lynette wanted me, but I knew it was never going to happen, and I didn't want to put her through what I saw her husband doing. My intentions were good, but the reality was nothing how I wanted to act. It had been two years since we ended our affair, and she went back to her husband. I was a mess in those two years. I would go from crying from missing her to insanely pissed off that she went back because I told her to. I knew deep down that no matter how much she loved me, how much she needed me, how much she wanted me, she was never going to be able to be authentic. I didn't want to torture her the same way, but differently than her husband and family had. Authenticity has never been something Lynette has been able to accomplish. Finely crafted lies to keep the nicely furnished life she created was a full-time job for her, and she was obsessed, and I have never been one to live unauthentic. Back then, I was angry at Lynette for not breaking out of the box everyone had built for her. With new eyes, I understand she did what she was able to do and, it didn't matter how much she loved me; she didn't have to tools to live life with the white light of transparency. In the two years we were apart, I survived, not well, but I survived. Every two to three months, Lynette would contact me, profess her love, and tell me she was ready, and she was going to tell her husband and family she was a lesbian and she was coming to me. The next day she would disappear; it was one of, if not the most painful times in my life. It all made me feel crazy. I would send texts obsessively asking if she was ok, concerned that something might have happened to her. Then her number would change, and I'd get a call from her best friend telling me she was going back to her husband, and they had just left for some tropical vacation. When she would do that to me, it felt cruel, cold, and accustomed to expecting it. We were like children sneaking out of our house at night, and our parents would find us ground us from speaking to each other. I think back on this differently, and I understand how cold this was for Lynette to do. She couldn't handle being with me, but she didn't want to lose me. Lynette cruelty was in the highest form, and it was not the most significant reason our marriage didn't work. I was insanely angry with her, but I never expressed it; I swallowed it. Lynette led the dance, and both Mark and I followed; she was always the single factor to all this pain. This got so bad that I would tell her husband whenever Lynette reached out to me. Of course, he didn't believe me, but I have never lied to Mark. I have been the only one who has never lied to him. Some days I would open a bottle of wine to finish it and wake up the next morning horrified with emails I would write to her husband about how awful he was. They were disgusting; no one deserves the words I would say to him. People just don't need to know some things, even if they are the truth. I didn't understand what he was going through; I didn't allow myself to see what Lynette and I were putting him through. He was fighting his truth; our truth was blind to him, and he was to us. Funny how that works when you must swallow passion, anger, betrayal, love, hate, longing, and confusion to get smashed together in one bite. Somewhere in my heart, I knew what Lynette was doing was wrong. She wanted me but didn't want anyone to know and was so focused on what others thought of her; she ripped apart two people and one that she professed to be heaven-sent to her. Ya me, crazy, huh? After two years, she returned to me, finally left her husband, and I could tell something was different. This entire fiasco weighed heavily on us all, and her husband was pushed further than anyone should be, but we all were in different ways. He finally pushed back one night after too much to drink, and Lynette's face was where he lost it. He had never been physical with her before, but it was all too much. Her husband could tell she didn't want to be with him; she was there out of obligation, familiarity, to please her family, to fit in, to enjoy the more beautiful things money could buy. But not because she was in love with him. When Lynette went back to Mark, he tried with all he had to bring passion to their marriage. He read all the right books, made all the right reservations, attempted all the right positions in life emotionally and physically, but the passion was never there. That is the crazy thing about the passionate side of love; you can't will it. A couple either has it, or they do not. When she came back to me after that night, we both were exhausted. We just wanted to love each other, that's all. I had spent my whole life being judged as a lesbian, criticized, understanding that the first conversations with strangers that I wanted to get to know would eventually lead to the, "So, when did you know you were a lesbian." I was exhausted, Lynette was exhausted. Love can only take so much; love cannot conquer all; we are the proof. The night I decided to transition was a decision that was made soon into our reunion *** That night, I call it a night, because it was the night that changed everything, everything changed. I was watching TV, and I heard Lynette talking with her son. Her son was getting married, and they were pregnant and expecting Lynette's first grandchild. Everyone was so excited; I could see it on Lynette's face when she would talk to anyone about the baby. Suddenly, the laughter stopped, and silence began. I yelled up the stairs. "Lynette, is everything ok." No response, my face twinged with confusion, and I made my way to her. When I turned the corner to the bedroom, I saw her. Her face had lost all color and turned grey. I ran to her and grabbed her hands, and looked at her directly in the eyes, and she said, What if my son doesn't allow me to see my grandbaby if they find out I'm a lesbian? My heart sank. I could not allow that to happen. That was the night I decided to transition for her children for her family. I loved her that much. What I do know about this entire experience is that we were all at fault. I should have walked away eight to nine years ago and never let this start. Lynette should have faced her demons instead of emotionally ripping two people apart. Mark should have allowed Lynette to leave him in peace; she was not a possession that completed his perfectly decorated home. No one did the right thing, and I'm left with looking into the mirror every day, not knowing who's reflection I am looking at *** If I was to sit down with Mark and talk to him, I bet I would understand that he is left with scars that he didn't deserve as well. Very few people in this world are evil; I am not one, Mark is not one, and Lynette is not one. I am remorseful for many reasons; I did many things wrong, and they have eaten at me since the beginning. I could never express these to Lynette because it was always about her throughout the whole process. Saving her, ensuring her lies were kept, I agreed to things like marriage counseling and camps understanding her and Mark were attending so she could prove to him they were not in love and not meant for each other. I agreed to the dates she would go on with Mark when we were living together to prove that they were not good together. I had to sit in the apartment and wait for her to get back from these dates that Mark would plan to win her back. Mark didn't know it was all a ploy; it was cruel. This was awful to do someone, and I agreed to it, and it ate and ate at me and still does to this day. The lies and deception and the amount I had to swallow to be with her were too much. It's a strange feeling looking at someone you love and wanting to scream at the top of your lungs, "Why did you do this to us, me and Mark? WHY!" Things I remember haunt me. The time I told her to go back to Mark initially and calling her to see when I could pick my stuff up from the apartment, and she giggled, "When we get another place, I am going to put up the pictures; you put too many holes in the walls." I wish at the time I could have told her, "Lynette, that's cruel, do you know that? Do you know that you want to keep me with you just enough so that you don't lose me?" Telling me repeatedly that you know that God wants us together, and that's why you see so many hearts, and you send me those pictures. Do you know that's cruel? That's cruel to me, and that's cruel to Mark. Do you know it's insensitive to Mark going back to him to prove to him that you guys aren't good together? "Do you know that's cruel and wrong? It's offensive to tell me that you can't be in a relationship with a woman, but you can't be without me. Do you know these things, the cruelty?" Looking back, I can see that Mark and I were played like fiddle, both of us. The center point of the cruelty started with Lynette. The further I get away, the more remorse I feel and the tremendous sense of regret I have. The sorrow and guilt dial point the most to Mark. Mark had no idea what was happening, and Lynette was not strong enough to be honest, if she were just honest from the beginning with herself, she would have never married Mark. Mark was a backup plan and always has been for Lynette, and the cruelty of that alone is astronomical. Lynette wasted ten years of my life, and she wasted even more of Mark's life by not being honest. Mark will always be Lynette's back up plan; he has the finances and experience she desires, and as cruel as it is to say it; it's the truth. In all of this, I pray for Marks' happiness. However, it is that he finds it. Sure, he wasn't perfect, but he was blindsided, lied to, manipulated, and used. I hope Mark figures out who he is and what it takes for him to be happy, and I hope he finds it. If Mark were in front of me today, I would say one thing and one thing alone, "I am sorry." To Lynette: I forgive you; I hope you find whatever you need to be happy in this life, but please be honest; it's the only way anyone ever finds peace. You might be surprised by how people you love will react. Let your family and children know who you are because they deserve the real Lynette. You have to stop lying to people to create a false reality; in the end, it hurts people. In conclusion, I tell this story to help people understand that transgenderism has become reverse bigotry to gays and lesbians. We have pre-teens not understanding that same-sex attraction and transgenderism are not the same. We have straight parents that don't grasp that every homosexual person at some time in their lives wanted to be the opposite sex, to be the same, and just fit in. We are creating a Disney fairy tale ending for kids that does not exist. by, Scott Newgent Donate To Support Scott's Work